User talk:Xof2328
Welcome!
[edit]
|
November 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Brussels has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Brussels-City-Belgium#!/pages/Brussels-City-Belgium/136182556415839.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:45, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Grand Place link
[edit]Hi. You have a good point. I meant to remove the link you had added, but really neither should be there. Cheers, Oreo Priest talk 04:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brussels, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. David Biddulph (talk) 12:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I have reverted your latest edit to Brussels as you gave no valid edit summary to explain your edit. It was not a 404. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:38, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Xof2328! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novable until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.