User talk:XmetalX

this user has persistant vandal records, please ban him

Thank you for experimenting with the page Paganism on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 05:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandal

this user is a vandal please ban him and his ip address —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Onaga (talk • contribs) 18:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I agree with Onaga's comment, this user has made several attemps to vandalise the site and he deserves to be banned The previous unsigned comment was made by Blackkrashed.

Not only has this user shown a pattern of abuse, but he has also repeatedly edited this talk page to remove negative reports of his activities, without archiving the content. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 02:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

June 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wonderbra. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dust Filter 08:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 12:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XmetalX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thought the information that i edited was true and was certainly not vandalis.

Decline reason:

Your edits are very clearly vandalism Gwernol 16:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.