User talk:Xiaobaobao20

Xiaobaobao20, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Xiaobaobao20! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xiaobaobao20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Xiaobaobao20 (talk) 17:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:28, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xiaobaobao20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

only have one account Xiaobaobao20 (talk) 19:03, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: This is the same person who has removed material from San Francisco Recreation & Parks Department using several accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Xiaobaobao20, you may have only one unblock request open at a time. If you add another, which I just removed, you will lose your access to this page.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:55, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xiaobaobao20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all my edit are based on true events. Apparently, there are some that deleted my edits and want to cover up the information. I did not commit any vandalism. Only have one account. Please unblock my account so I continue to contribute edits. I firmly believe that all Wikipedia articles should be freely edit by anyone and not just a government agencies, not its agents, and any supporters. Thank You Xiaobaobao20 (talk) 10:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts, but do not address that in this request. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xiaobaobao20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will only have one accounts now. Please unblock my account. Thank You. Xiaobaobao20 (talk) 10:57, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This still doesn't address your edits. RickinBaltimore (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xiaobaobao20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

how should I address my edits? Xiaobaobao20 (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A good question but not a reason for unblock.

You are very lucky here that you are such a nice person that we haven't felt yet like revoking your talk page access for all these failed requests. As to your edits, well ... maybe sourcing them, at least, would help. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xiaobaobao20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not vandalized any pages as they alledged. I did not removed information from the page. In fact, there are people that removed the information I edited in. I believe the blocking admin person have a conflict of interest in the information I wrote. I tried to cite sources (news articles), but they removed that also. For primary sources of personal experiences and knowledges, it would be unwise public display identity of the source. Also I only have only one accounts. If it hints many accounts, it is probably a shared devises. Please carefully review my block request and unblock my account. I like to continue to contribute making edits, so information can be shared. wikipedia articles should be freely written by anyone and not just governments, its agents, and supporters.Xiaobaobao20 (talk) 7:34 am, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

This is not consistent with reality.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:51, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]