This is an archive of past discussions about User:Xemoi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Your recent revert of Ayn Rand was mistaken on a few counts. First of all, the edit comment falsely accused me of vandalism. In fact, a content dispute is never considered vandalism. To qualify as vandalism, it has to be my intent to harm the article. As it was not vandalism, marking your edit as minor was also an error. Finally, it turns out that there are a number of sources (cited within this article and related ones) which consider Rand to be a cult leader, in as many words. Therefore, removing this category without explanation and justification is unacceptable. Continuing to act in this way is considered disruptive and can be punished by blocks. Thank you for understanding. Al02:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
see talk page for rand?
you didn't comment, in fact no one has commented on the 'lay philosopher' category which seems to be the best fit for her work. don't say 'see talk page' unless you actually say or add something dealing with the issue at hand. --Buridan14:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Xemoi. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
