User talk:Xctome

Please stop

WP:VANDAL Your edit to User talk:Koavf constitutes vandalism on Wikipedia. If you don't stop it, you'll be subject to blocking or banning. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:33, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic collision

Your edits are breaking the page by converting characters to html entities. Please stop. --Versa geek 01:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Traffic collision has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CWenger (talk) 01:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Traffic collision constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. CWenger (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Traffic collision. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiderolls 01:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Traffic collision, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Traffic collision was changed by Xctome (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.902247 on 2011-01-30T01:48:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiderolls 01:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xctome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just putting a website to a funny youtube video. Gimmie another chance.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xctome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand what I've been blocked for. I will not make destructive edit and will make useful edit instead.

Decline reason:

You're going to have to try harder than that. Why did you keep making disruptive edits, even after all the warnings above? As far as I'm concerned, this block is the only thing standing between you and more vandalism. It's up to you to convince me otherwise. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xctome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It has been about 3 years, and I'm sorry for being a vandal, I read this and will start editing constructively.

Decline reason:

Enough of your frivolous unblock requests; your talkpage access has been revoked for wasting everyone's time. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.