User talk:XRAYXRAY1652

July 2021

Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. An edit that you recently made to Yadava Naidu seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Notfrompedro (talk) 16:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

XRAYXRAY1652, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi XRAYXRAY1652! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Tera Mera Saath Rahe

Hello. Is this a made-up article? The article says the show "was" released September 2021, but the sources are from 2013. --- Possibly ☎ 17:48, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tera Mera Saath Rahe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tera Mera Saath Rahe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --- Possibly ☎ 17:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajab Parivaar Ki Gazab Kahaani (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ajab Parivaar Ki Gazab Kahaani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ajab Parivaar Ki Gazab Kahaani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ghar Ek Mandir - Kripa Agrasen Maharaj Ki moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ghar Ek Mandir - Kripa Agrasen Maharaj Ki, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshya (2021 TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lakshya (2021 TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:06, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion - PLEASE READ

I realize you probably won't read this, but it's worth a chance. YOU, the person behind the account, are blocked. When you create new accounts as you've been doing, it's called block evasion and the new accounts are called sockpuppets. That is absolutely against Wikipedia policy. At this point, you've created so many accounts you are considered banned from Wikipedia. All of your edits, anything you create, can be reverted on sight. I'm sure you've seen this happenning - now you know why. Creating new accounts DOES NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. It makes it worse. You need to work on getting unblocked on your original account (Vyom420) but that's really unlikely given your continued block evasion. The standard offer is probably your only chance, which requires a minimum of six months of no editing here, no new accounts, not even with an IP - nothing. Ideally, you'd edit on another Wikipedia site BUT follow the policies (which is why you were originally blocked here). That's not easy and I doubt that granting the standard offer would come easily given your repeated evasion and continued issues with Wikipedia policy. Hopefully you'll think about this. Ravensfire (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]