User talk:XAssassinSkillz

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Woody (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Emile Heskey appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Woody (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Emile Heskey. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Woody (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Emile Heskey, you may be blocked from editing. Woody (talk) 14:08, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How is it in any way disruptive??

This edit is disruptive as you are removing reliably sourced and verified information with your own point of view that is not backed up by reliable sources. Every piece of information in Wikipedia needs to be verifiable particularly information in our biographies of living people such as Emile Heskey.

This edit is plainly disruptive as it is introducing clear facutal errors into the article. Changing Heskey's squad number as well as continually claiming Almunia has played for Spain are entirely disruptive as they are plain wrong and misleading to our readers. Please edit within our guidelines that are all linked above in my response or in the welcome message at the top of this page. If you don't, you are likely to be blocked. Woody (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I must have missed that, I was sure it was Iker Casillas as was the entire worlds media and indeed the Spanish national football team were under the impression that Casillas played. It is truly amazing that we are all under the impression that Almunia has yet to acquire a cap for any national team. All flights of fanct aside, if you keep inserting false information into articles and call other editors idiots then you will be blocked from Wikipedia.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Truth, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Truth was changed by XAssassinSkillz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957539 on 2011-05-17T13:30:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:30, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Truth, you may be blocked from editing. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 13:54, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XAssassinSkillz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just trying to help with editing! Besides, they weren't all my sole doing, I stopped after I edited Almunia last time because I genuinely thought it was him who lifted the World Cup. The recent edits must have been someone else! Please can I have a second chance?? Best Regards. XAssassinSkillz (talk) 14:27, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's no way your edits to Truth can possibly be considered anything other than vandalism. By you. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:39, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why am I still banned?