User talk:XAM2175/2024/04
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
The Rhine
Hello XAM2175
How would you feel now about replacing the item in the bibliography of the article on the [Rhine] with a direct (Cite EB1911) Wikisource link? You deleted it last year saying "in order to have consistent unlinked style across all cites in article". I don't see that the [Bibliography] feature referring to the Rhine is linked by any of the references - i.e. it just stands alone. Grateful for your thoughts.
ArbieP ArbieP (talk) 15:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hello again XAM2175
- Not heard from you; let me know if there's still a problem with a (Cite EB1911) wikilink. ArbieP (talk) 09:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Lokomotiv- und Waggonbaufabrik Krupp
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, XAM2175. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lokomotiv- und Waggonbaufabrik Krupp".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)