User talk:Discombobulates

Welcome!

Hi XA1dUXvugi! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hi XA1dUXvugi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:10, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which edit was that? I can't tell where it I can see if an edit I made was minor or not in my contributions page. I don't recall having changed the meaning of a page recently though. XA1dUXvugi (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On your contributions page the ones marked as minor should have a bold "m" to the left of the article title I believe. The edits https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_satellite_navigation_software&diff=prev&oldid=1089623679&diffmode=source or https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Organic_Maps&diff=prev&oldid=1089616396&diffmode=source for instance are not a minor changes. Hope that helps going forward. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed SVG map of the Hispano-Lusophone world.svg

commons:Detailed SVG map of the Hispano-Lusophone world.svg - can you use different colors for Spanish and for Portuguese? Maybe green (por) and red (spa)? With green and red one can also do shades. Yellow as in the original wouldn't be well suited for shades. 77.191.148.102 (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The colour scheme is from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Detailed_SVG_map_of_the_Hispanophone_world.svg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Detailed_SVG_map_of_the_Lusophone_world.svg. Changing it would not fit the style of these maps, and would be impractical, as I would have to find similar nuances of another colour.

Maybe you could just use the two maps individually? I'm not too sure why there were grouped together on European integration. XA1dUXvugi (talk) 18:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Red green colour blindness is quite common, so those are not great colours to choose. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Working towards consensus

I'm not one to advise: I thought it was blindingly obvious to reduce Keyboard technology, Computer keyboard and Keyboard layout down to two articles but none of the builders of each of those articles would concede, no matter what WP:CFORK says. I gave up, it is really not that important to get bogged down in detail.

My best advice is, for controversial articles, restrict your changes to max one section a day and wait for a response. A week is not too long between edits. Mass changes just invite mass reverts. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bold, revert, discuss

I don't mind that you used my talk page to question my reversion of your WP:bold change to that map, but as a general principle (and specifically per WP:BRD), the place to do it is the article talk page. Who knows, you might find that other editors support your proposition. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information XA1dUXvugi (talk) 17:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]