User talk:Wyatt150

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wyatt150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, thank you in advance to whomever takes the time to read this. I am appealing this block as I strongly believe this is the wrong direction to take. I was blocked due to a couple of edits I made of something I believe to be true. I was warned not to continue editing that page so I agreed not to and then took it to the talk page so I wasn't getting into any edit warring. That is when I got blocked and don't understand why as I took the advice on board and practiced it. Wyatt150 (talk) 23:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The timeline of edits disagrees with you:

You got your last warning at 04:31
You posted to the talk page at 04:36
But then instead of waiting for a reply, you edited the page again to your version at 04:46 - that is still edit warring.

And the article you were edit warring on was not your only questionable edits. You made this edit, with no source. I can find no evidence to support your change, and the official product website clearly contradicts your change. Mr.Z-man 04:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Wyatt150 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK I understand would I done wrong there but from now on I will wait on a reply on the talk page before editing Wyatt150 (talk) 16:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Glad you recognize and accept those conditions. Since you seem willing to adhere to them, I have unblocked this account. only (talk) 23:09, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than the condition you have suggested I would prefer if you agreed to abide by the following conditions:

You agree not to edit Kane (wrestler), if there is a change you believe should be made you will suggest it on the talk page instead of doing it yourself; and
If an edit you make is reverted you will follow the bold, revert, discuss cycle. That is, if you make an edit and it is reverted you will start a discussion on the article's talk page.

If these conditions are okay with you, I will ask Materialscientist is he has an objection and if not I'll unblock you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I completely agree to both the conditions you have given. I will not edit Kane (wrestler) and anything I believe should be changed or added I will not edit it myself and will always suggest it on the talk page. And if I make an edit and it is reverted I will discuss it on the talk page. Wyatt150 (talk) 21:05, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]