User talk:WriterEditorPenn
March 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to DontDateHimGirl, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on DontDateHimGirl.com. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- HidariMigi (talk) 23:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
You've been reported for edit warring at DontDateHimGirl.com
[edit]Please see WP:AN3#User:WriterEditorPenn reported by User:HidariMigi (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. If you continue to revert without getting consensus for your changes, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you are associated with the website, you should read the rules for editors with a WP:Conflict of interest. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
This notice in a nutshell: For using edits to fight with other editors, you have been reported and may be blocked. |
Hello WriterEditorPenn, This is a formal notification to inform you that you have been reported for Violation of the WP:3RR/WP:EW policy at the WP:AN/EW noticeboard. |
Warning: unexplained removal of content
[edit]You are being warned per the result of a 3RR case. If you continue to remove sourced content from the article without getting consensus for your changes you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. See WP:VANDTYPES#Blanking. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Edit warrring at DontDateHimGirl.com
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:WriterEditorPenn reported by User:HidariMigi (Result: 1 week). EdJohnston (talk) 21:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Report at Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic DontDateHimGirl.com. Thank you. --HidariMigi (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- In that discussion I've proposed that you be indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you have any interest in working with regular Wikipedia editors or listening to feedback, please add your own comment there. EdJohnston (talk) 03:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 03:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)