User talk:Wreckvalle

Please stop!

First, your last couple of additions have been dead links.

Second, please read Wikipedia's External links guidelines and maybe WP:Spam#How not to be a spammer. You are not allowed to add links to your own website, but that is what you appear to be doing. I know it's not a bad resource for some articles, but what you are doing amounts to spamming. Slow down, read our articles, gain some familiarity with how Wikipedia works, contribute something to the articles besides links to your own site. Just because we're open source doesn't mean that we're here to be used to promote sites. And even the best external links aren't as worthwhile to us as getting our articles up to speed-- in an ideal world, we would need few or no external links. OK, that said...

Welcome!

Hello, Wreckvalle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Mwanner | Talk 01:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Shipwreckartifact.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Shipwreckartifact.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Shipwreckartifact.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 15:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Shipwreckartifactcagelamp.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Shipwreckartifactcagelamp.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Shipwreckartifactcagelamp.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 15:15, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:OregonPorthole.jpg

The file File:OregonPorthole.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Lobsterdiving.jpg

The file File:Lobsterdiving.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]