User talk:Wp914

October 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nick Bosa. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for edit warring, as you did at Nick Bosa. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one "warring". I simply made a factual contribution to the Wikipedia article (completely referenced), which someone continues to remove with no notice, or explanation. I don't even know who it is because they never notify me who they are. Evidently, someone doesn't like the entry, but they give no reason why.

Perhaps, EvergreenFir, you can explain to me why I am the one being blocked, when someone else continues to vandalize my contribution. Maybe you could also explain what basis there is for disagreeing with an historical fact other than misinformation.

I tried to request protection for my entry, (the first time I have had to do so) but received some vague notification that I should have requested it somewhere else. Wp914 (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]