User talk:Worstlimbs

Welcome!

Hi Worstlimbs! I noticed your contributions to Workers' Party of Korea and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Worstlimbs (talk) 03:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Shushugah. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United Socialist Party of Venezuela have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. I see you are making a number of additions to various left wing Articles, without sources and would recommend you read up on WP:NPOV, WP:RS before making edits, or else they will continue to be reverted. Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Austrian People's Party, you may be blocked from editing. You are boldly editing dozens of infoboxes of various political parties, all of which have been reverted. In the above example you included contradictory ideologies, without any edit summary. I would highly suggest you discuss at a talk page first before making changes that are swiftly reverted afterwards for lack of WP:RS, edit messages. Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at United Russia. Uness232 (talk) 01:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 03:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Stoopid (6ix9ine song), you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 05:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t do anything Worstlimbs (talk) 22:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

unblock|reason= Because I am trying to make Wikipedia better and great again. Worstlimbs (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking again

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here because I am sorry for what I did Worstlimbs (talk) 03:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

I surrender

I give up I will serve my block until I am released back I’m sorry for what I did Worstlimbs (talk) 03:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstlimbs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because I apologize for what I did.

Decline reason:

Sorry. This is an encyclopedia. The last thing we want around here is someone who spreads lies. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 23:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Worstlimbs (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I promise not to spread lies

Worstlimbs (talk) 00:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 4

I promise not to spread any more lies Worstlimbs (talk) 00:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 5

{{unblock|reason= Because I apologize for what I did I promise not to do it again and learn from my mistakes and never vandalize Wikipedia again. Worstlimbs (talk) 21:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 54639

UTRS appeal #54639 is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra I might suggest revoking TPA as the user doesn't seem to get it. — DaxServer (t · c) 21:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DaxServer: Looks like a WP:CIR issue. They've had two strikes already at UTRS. Maybe a six month longer Wikibreak would help. I will copy my decline here. Maybe it will be easier to follow instructions.

Deepfriedokra 2022-02-11 22:12:38 I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please concisely and clearly describe how your editing merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

  {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

If you were editing using a mobile device, you might not be able to see/edit your talk page. You might want to use a computer instead. Thank you for your attention to these matters.

@Worstlimbs: I'm afraid that if you post another mangled unblock request or post one that fails to adequately address the reasons for your block, I'll be left with no choice but to remove talk page access. That would leave you with UTRS. If I see another UTRS ticket that does not address your block, I wll ban you from UTRS for six months. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 6

{{unblock|reason= Because I swear to follow the five pillars and keep Wikipedia great . Worstlimbs (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 7

{{unblock|r the reason that I got blocked is because that I vandalized Wikipedia and I am sorry for that. I promise never to vandalize again and I will make constructive edits in the field of politics. Worstlimbs (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 8

{{unblock|r the reason that I got blocked is because that I vandalized Wikipedia and I am sorry for that. I promise never to vandalize again and I will make constructive edits in the field of sports. Worstlimbs (talk) 03:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #54766

is open. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
is now closed, but we are of a mind to unblock. For transparency, have asked user to post here. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How long will this take Worstlimbs (talk) 00:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 9

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstlimbs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason that I got blocked is because that I vandalized Wikipedia and I am sorry for that. I promise never to vandalize again and I will make constructive edits in the field of politics. Worstlimbs (talk) 21:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've corrected the template WP:AGF — DaxServer (t · c) 21:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious but how long does the administrator review process take for the unblocking process Worstlimbs (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s been three days and I haven’t heard anything back Worstlimbs (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeals don't have a specific timeline, as they're reviewed by volunteer admins. Up to 2 weeks is fairly normal. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(It also takes longer as you have a number of declined appeals - admins who have declined one can't review another, so you have to wait longer for a new admin to take a look) Nosebagbear (talk) Nosebagbear (talk) 11:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking 10

Because I wasn’t here to build an encyclopedia I promise to be here to build an Encyclopedia and I will make constructive edits in all topics Worstlimbs (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking August

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstlimbs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason that I got blocked is because that I vandalized Wikipedia and I am sorry for that. I promise never to vandalize again and I will make constructive edits in the field of politics. Worstlimbs (talk) 02:49, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Letting you edit politics strikes me as a very bad idea. But, OK, let's see what you've got. I'd like you to prove that you can make constructive edits to Wikipedia. Please read through our core content policies, how to cite sources, and this guide. Using this knowledge, please propose a constructive edit here on your talk page. It could be as simple as suggesting a fact that could be included in an article about your favorite video game or film, backed up with a citation to a reliable source. The proposed edit should be something that can be copied verbatim into an encyclopedia article. You can immediately make another unblock request with your response. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocking August 2

the reason that I got blocked is because that I vandalized Wikipedia and I am sorry for that. I promise never to vandalize again and I will make constructive edits in the field of sports. Worstlimbs (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking August 2.5

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstlimbs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason that I got blocked is because that I vandalized Wikipedia and I am sorry for that. I promise never to vandalize again and I will make constructive edits in the field of sports. Worstlimbs (talk)

Decline reason:

You are clearly deliberately wasting our time at this point. Do not make another unblock request unless you follow NinjaRobotPirate's instructions above. Yamla (talk) 10:21, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don’t want to and I don’t have to Worstlimbs (talk) 18:40, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking August 3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstlimbs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason that I got blocked is because that I vandalized Wikipedia and I am sorry for that. I promise never to vandalize again and I will make constructive edits in the field of music. Worstlimbs (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As already stated. 331dot (talk) 08:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We don't want to and we don't have to.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

--jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]