User talk:Worley-d

Hi there, just wondered if you would help on a new article i am creating (gathered you may know from comments on Stoubridge Junc. page), Round Oak Steel Terminal. Cheers--Greenfinch100 15:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woo! It's Dave Worley! Partay! Born Acorn 00:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hide the expensive stuff first though. FiggyBee 16:27, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WSMR

See reply. Also, don't forget to sign with "~" four times.

Simply south 22:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found some sources, both BBC, if you are interested. See the talk page. One of them requires a video player e.g. realplayer but may work with windows media player or anything else suitable.

I will add these to the reference list.

Simply south 23:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Usage + WP:Rail

2002 - 2003 are in this Excel document
2004 - 2005 are located seperately here for more up to date figures

If you are interested, why not join WP:Rail? Simply south 00:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just sign yourself up under the partipants. It is entirely voluntary. Go to Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways#Participants.

Also

Simply south 00:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Midland Main Line

I see you are a regular contributor. Could you please tell me if the Midland Main Line reaches Burton-(up?)on-Trent please? I don't find any reference to it on the Midland Mainline page. Worley-d 23:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, Burton-on-Trent is a traditional Midland station; the undercroft at St. Pancras in London was specifically designed to accept beer kegs coming down from Burton. Today (2007) there are 1-2 direct Midland Mainline services to London per day. Outside of the rush hours Burton station is on the line from Derby-Birmingham and served by Virgin CrossCountry and Central Trains. Topologically, the station can be reached via either by reversing south from Derby, or taking the direct curve north of Trent Junction which heads due east. Hope that helps! Sladen 08:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TT Forums

I looked at your notice on talk:TT Forums and appreciate your effort, but since the article as I saw it did not have any reliable sources that asserted notability per WP:WEB, I have deleted the article under criteria for speedy deletion, articles-#7. Awyong J. M. Salleh 07:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

West Midlands railway stations

You may be interested in template:West Midlands railway stations and the issues on its talk page. Andy Mabbett 09:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Station codes, coordinates

You can now add three-letter codes and lat/long coordinates, to UK station articles. see Hamstead railway station for an example. Regards, Andy Mabbett 21:14, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grayrigg rail crash

sorry, I got confused with Washwood. do you know who deleted the part about it actually happening at Lambrigg, it is a fact, not just some text added on there?

thanks

--Llamafish 16:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Midas

lol, don't look at me - I didn't put the bio infomation in - blame Dave :) Icecold 13:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most pointless routebox ever?

Catch me who can

					Catch me who can

Thanks for the hours of work you must have spent developing the routebox for Stourbridge Town Branch Line ;-). I wondered if this might be another contender for the title. – Tivedshambo (talk) 06:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Butetown Branch Line. Simply south 11:38, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

I've created a new discussion page at Template talk:West Midlands railway stations/Layout discussion in order to discuss which of the suggested layouts should be used for this template. Please feel free to voice your opinions. – Tivedshambo (talk) 08:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stourbridge Town

Is there still a promise of a better picture for the Stourbridge Town railway station article? The current one, which you admitted was "artistic", is not especially illustrative or helpful. --RFBailey 16:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Preston railway station

The article Preston railway station you nominated as a good article has passed , see Talk:Preston railway station for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Rt . 15:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Line Speeds

Thanks for adding the other line speeds!

Perhaps you know some more for the Snow Hill Lines region (I only really know the section I added between Worcester and Kidderminster).

I have to say that info on line speeds is a major gap in articles like that.

Regards, Btline (talk) 17:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of T. H. Baker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on T. H. Baker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 02:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Droitwich Spa Junction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Droitwich Spa Junction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Droitwich Spa Junction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Preston railway station

Preston railway station has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]