User talk:Worldnuse

August 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2010 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. postdlf (talk) 00:22, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Worldnuse, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Worldnuse! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

This draft appears to be an attempt to use Wikipedia as a web host to criticize the US legal system and decisions of the US Supreme Court. See Wikipedia is not a web host. Also see the author's record of spamming Wikipedia articles with opinions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Worldnuse/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Worldnuse/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Worldnuse/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Worldnuse/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 01:41, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worldnuse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

New User, Worldnuse has no intention to abuse. Instead of providing opportunity to revise permanently blocking is unfair, please unblock! Respectfully, worldnuse New User, you could ask me to edit not abuse authority to permanently block "worldnuse" unfair, please unblockWorldnuse (talk) 08:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worldnuse (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

New User, Worldnuse has no intention to abuse. Administrator who blocked me abused his authority! If opportunity to edit was provided, I would! Worldnuse in response stated, it has not intention to abuse! Administrator manipulating his authority to make worldnuse guilty of something it is not! It is apparent this abuse of authority is in violation of racial discriminatory due process abuse of authority editorial integrity violation! Among three criteria 1.understand what you have been blocked for, 2.will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and 3.will make useful contributions instead, item 3 is the intention of worldnuse - to make useful contribution, if "worldnuse" knew, what causes disruption, criteria worldnuse would not do..Worldnuse will learn criteria, had no itention to delay or disrupt wikipedia service, only has purpose to make useful contribution! Respectfully request Unblock, There is a conflict of interest, and racial and national origin animosity of the specific administrator, please, forward this communication to "fair balanced editor", Thanks!

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Accusations of administrator abuse and racism without any evidence constitute personal attacks, which are not permitted here. Your talkpage access has been revoked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]