User talk:Word27
January 2008
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from People to People Student Ambassador Program. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Esanchez(Talk 2 me or Sign here) 06:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]I saw what you did with the People To People article,Im not even sure you still come on here,but Id like to tell you why they reverted it.It is VERY common on wikipedia to have a criticism section.The reason for this is that if someone goes to read about a subject they want to hear both sides.Using your football reference,there wouldnt be a criticism section about a person like the coach.The reason for this is Im sure they tell his stats and points and etc. this would tell the reader where he may have screwed up.You can look at many articles on here,and youll find criticism on most.Some articles dont need a criticism section,like your coaches page.Im sorry you were confused.
wish you the best,--D3t3ctiv3 (talk) 18:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)