User talk:Blue Cascade

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Wood Council (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.awc.org/AWC/about.php. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:American Wood Council may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 20:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Woodcouncil, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 20:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|The page was denied because of copyright, but I've since submitted the cited page to Wikimedia Commons and verified my identity to release the copyright. Please unblock.}}

One issue was this user posting the text in this file to Wikipedia.

File:American Wood Council.pdf

They have since released the copyright to this text, so that issue is resolved. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Woodcouncil is still blocked. Do I need to do something else? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodcouncil (talk • contribs) 18:00, 9 February 2016‎

I confirm - you are still blocked but you did make an unblock request.

I only do certain volunteer things. Other volunteers manage unblocking. You are in line right now for review to be unblocked. Some of these things take a few days. I am not sure what the current schedule is. My advice is to wait not more than three days and if there is a problem, signal me again by saying, "{{ping|bluerasberry}}." Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woodcouncil → Woodcouncil

Status: In progress

Current username: Woodcouncil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (ping user)
Target username: Woodcouncil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · target logs · block log · list user · global contribs · central auth · Google) (advise user)
Previous renames: current user, target user, Queue: open req, closed req
For renamer use: Email target username, usurp user, rename user
Datestamp: 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Reason: Account was blocked for copyright reasons which have since been resolved, and because I chose a username similar to the page I was trying to create. I'd like to rename the account to move forward.

Woodcouncil (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Woodcouncil (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Something went wrong here. There should be two names listed here - the old one and the new one that you would choose. Could you try again? Please go to Special:GlobalRenameRequest for a new name. You are right - group accounts and business accounts are not allowed on Wikipedia. Only accounts for individuals are. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Blue Cascade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Blue Cascade (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Account was blocked for copyright reasons which have since been resolved, and because I chose a username similar to the page I was trying to create. I'd like to rename the account to move forward.

Accept reason:

Accepted. Username is already changed. Please, bear in mind the WP:COI policy and don't try to WP:PROMOTE your company. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Woodcouncil (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If unblocked, what kind of edits do you intend to make? Do you still intend to promote American Wood Council? DO you understand the WP:COI policy? Please, answer those questions here. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem with the new name, and so I have renamed the account - but I'll leave the unblock request pending further review of answers to the questions above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Boing! said Zebedee: Will this user be able to log in, since they don't know the username has changed? Vanjagenije (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanjagenije: I've sent this user a message via OTRS informing about the rename.--Darwinius (talk) 09:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And User talk:Woodcouncil still exists as a redirect, so as soon as they look at their talk page they'll see the rename info. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the COI and understand that it's a COI for me (an employee of the organization) to create a page about the organization. I understand that I can only request edits to pages referencing AWC and would use the account to make such requests. Blue Cascade (talk) 16:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. I unblocked your account. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]