User talk:WonLove

Welcome!

Hello, WonLove, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Scholarships.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RileyBugz (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Scholarships.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Scholarships.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a rejected submission at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RileyBugz (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scholarships.com

Hello WonLove,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Scholarships.com for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mduvekot (talk) 18:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scholarships.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scholarships.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GSMR (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

I did see your note on the "scholarships.com" article. I see you're relatively new. So, to address what you're asking. To establish notability, we do need sources that are reliable, but that's only part of the equation. Those reliable sources must also cover the subject in reasonable depth. The references you listed either just dropped the site's name, or briefly mentioned it for no more than a paragraph in the context of work that was substantially about something else. That's not enough. Ideally, the cited reference should be mainly or entirely about the article subject. But at the very least, it needs to go into a good degree of depth and detail about it, not just mention it in passing. Otherwise, the "article" is really just a directory entry, and that's not part of Wikipedia's purpose. I hope that helps to clear things up, but feel free to ask if you have any questions. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:42, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance and explanation Seraphimblade, I really appreciate it. I just don't understand why everyone is being so quick to delete some of my entries, rather than bolster the article. I think I am beginning to understand, but am also frustrated at some of my efforts so quickly just being summarily discarded. I will work on it and try again. WonLove (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your assitance. Unfortunately, now I am unable to make another attempt at publishing a strong article steeped in references from multiple sources, etc. as only admins are allowed to post on the topic unless I can get it "undeleted"? WonLove (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did create protect the article, which is pretty standard when inappropriate articles keep getting created on something. What I would suggest doing is creating the article as a draft, such as at Draft:Scholarships.com. While drafts aren't totally unrestricted (they can't be blatant ads, copyright violations, hit pieces, etc.), they get a lot more leeway than mainspace articles and aren't required to immediately show notability like mainspace articles are, so that gives you more time to work on it. Once you think the article is properly referenced and ready to go, you can have articles for creation review it. The reviewer will either approve it to move to mainspace or point out any problems that need fixed first. If it gets approved as a draft, I'll happily unprotect the title for the move to the main encyclopedia. I would generally recommend a newer editor create drafts anyway, as selecting an appropriate topic for a new article is one of the more challenging things we do. Or start out with edits to existing articles, and move on to new ones once you have some experience under your belt. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 00:42, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for your help Seraphimblade. I actually didn't even realize until recently that anybody could/would see a "Draft" prior to my submitting it and it was deleted without my knowledge, as the email I had associated with the account was not functioning properly and I wasn't notified. I will try again, using your advice. WonLove (talk) 14:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marianne Comtell

The article Marianne Comtell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no sources other than IMDB

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too suggestive of an advertised company profile since patents are unnecessary here and won't help for notability; what we specifically need is major independent significant news, and not simply announcements, company interviews, notices, press releases or similar; there's no inherited notability from others.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:WonLove/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance and suggestions. I will research and edit further over the weekend. WonLove (talk) 14:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Scatterbrain (KXM album) ‎, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see WP:MOSALBUM to better format album articles Jennica✿ / ^talk 01:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scholarships.com (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scholarships.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Winged Blades^Godric 16:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WonLove, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades^Godric 16:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scholarships.com has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scholarships.com. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 00:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scholarships.com has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scholarships.com. Thanks! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scholarships.com (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scholarships.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scholarships.com (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheDragonFire was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You may wish to look at creating an article for the .scholarships TLD first, as it should be easier to establish notability for this, and then come back and work on this article later once the company has gained more coverage. You can look at .com and .club as an example.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scholarships.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheDragonFire (talk) 10:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scholarships.com (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still requires more WP:42 sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scholarships.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 07:28, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scholarships.com has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scholarships.com. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scholarships.com (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of websites, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scholarships.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scholarships.com (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scholarships.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The most recent draft includes two citations using in-depth articles from reliable sources. I do not understand why the submission was once again refused. This is significant coverage, not mere mentions, of a website that has been around for nearly 20 years and is linked to by high schools and colleges around the country, among other institutions. WonLove (talk) 14:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:The_answer_to_life,_the_universe,_and_everything - WonLove (talk) 15:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scholarships.com

Hello, WonLove. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scholarships.com".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:16, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KXM (album)

The article KXM (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album. Fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of KXM (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KXM (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KXM (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]