User talk:Wolverinestudent12

Wolverinestudent12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wolverinestudent12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Are you sure this is worth the effort?

You seem to be putting a lot of effort into Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q. Are you sure it's worth the effort? We already have an article on the wider competition, and there doesn't seem to be a lot to set the Wisconsin regional competition apart from the regional Hi-Q competition. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

This is definitely worth the effort because the other Hi-Q page only discusses Pennsylvania and Washington's Hi-Q, and no one knows much about Wisconsin and Alabama's past finalists, sponsors, etc. A quick Google search proves that there is only one site on WI's, fmmarinette.com. I want it to be on Wikipedia too.

If there's only one site with this information, it is likely not sufficiently sourced to be considered verifiable and may not pass the AFC review. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is more than one site with this info, just not for specifically Wisconsin. Unless you have personally gone to a Hi-Q match and are a real fan, then you would not know that it was started in Pennsylvania and even when it was spread to other states, it stayed exactly the same. Check my references when I am done.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michigan Hi-Q (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Delco Hi-Q instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is insufficient evidence that this state-level competition is notable separate from the interstate competition described at Delco Hi-Q. I would argue that the existing article should be rewritten and expanded to include indications of the competition's expansion beyond one county to now encompass multiple states, but that individual articles about the individual states' competitions would be redundant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61: Actually, if you would take a look at the Delco Hi-Q page, there is no information on the WISCONSIN/MICHIGAN Finalists, no info on the national championships whatsoever, no mention of the sponsors, and no mention of the member teams.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michigan Hi-Q (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Michigan Hi-Q instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitting the draft with no change will not alter the outcome, and is an abuse of the AFC process.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there is no such thing as Michigan Hi-Q alone, and no page of that exists.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michigan Hi-Q (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only reliable references are to the same local newspaper. Not sufficient to establish stand-alone notability for a branch event.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Submission Comments

Please do not remove AFC Submission comments from your draft, as you did in this edit. These comments form a part of the history of the submission process, and are useful not only to you as the submitter but to other reviewers to see the history of the submission process. If the draft gets accepted for publication, all of these comments will be automatically deleted from the published article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wolverinestudent12: OK, did not know, thanks!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michigan Hi-Q (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Literally nothing has changed since this article's last submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wisconsin/Michigan Hi-Q, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]