User talk:Wolfsbayne

November 2008

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Same-sex marriage in California, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' None of the four edits you have made this evening qualify as "minor edits." Mike Doughney (talk) 06:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note

Firstly, an extremely belated welcome-- you've been around as long as myself and no one's thought to welcome you! Secondly, I've unfortunately had to undo your most recent change to Gay bowel syndrome because it was unexplained blanking of a large amount of referenced content. I also notice that you've previously done the same to American imperialism. I'm not sure what your reasoning is, but do discuss it on the talk page if you have a major objection to any content. More opinions and criticism makes for better articles. Finally, the user who left you a note in 2008 is right: tagging edits which aren't uncontroversial as minor edits simply makes it harder for everyone else. Do remember to only check it if it's something no one will disagree with. In any case, if you have any questions, do feel free to leave a note on my talk page or by email. Cheers. sonia♫ 19:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Your recent editing history at Tea Party movement shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The information I added was relevant and actual historical information. The major hole in the information was "who started the movement?", so I added it. Why someone would delete it is ridiculous, unless they have an agenda. - wolfsbayne

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]