User talk:Wizzywiz

Welcome!

Noticed you din't have a welcome message yet, so here we are - Welcome!

Hello, Wizzywiz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Cheers!xC | ☎ 05:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Do Jasoos.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Do Jasoos.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cheb Mami.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cheb Mami.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Sounds and Mind

A tag has been placed on Sounds and Mind, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 06:42, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Sounds and Mind

Your recent edit to Sounds and Mind (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 06:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Hi! You uploaded this image: Image:Ganga Devi.jpg and released it in PD. Is this image drawn by you? Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image tagging

Hi!

you uploaded the image Image:Hrithik Roshan.jpg, and have said you made it yourself. Did you draw it yourself, or are you the photographer? xC | ☎ 07:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so, because the image seemed familiar, but I couldn't place it exactly. I'm afraid that the original copyright of the image still lies with the photographer, or with Roshan, depending on their agreement.

Indeed after modifying an image it might seem completely different from the original, but its original copyright would still be of the original source-file. I'm going to have to tag this image for deletion, as it cannot be released under PD.

My apologies for this, this was also the reason why it couldn't be included in his article on Hrithik Roshan. Wikipedia has to face a lot of trouble due to copyright infringement, and this is the only way to reduce those problems.

We appreciate your contributions, and please don't be disheartened by this. It happens to all of us, and the best way to learn from it is to read up on our policies. A good starting point would be Wikipedia:Introduction_2.

Happy editing! Cheers! xC | ☎ 05:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ganga_Devi.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ganga_Devi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. cohesion 17:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging

Hi there,

Got another image to ask you about - Image:Vikram.jpg. Self-made implying you are the photographer or is this a Photoshopped image? Regards, xC | ☎ 12:30, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 12:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Evolution

Wikipedia is not a soapbox.

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Evolution for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. --Orange Mike 14:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Evolution and Belief

I've nominated Evolution and Belief, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Evolution and Belief satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution and Belief and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Evolution and Belief during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.--cjllw ʘ TALK 08:40, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not split the text of an existing article into a new article just because you disagree with the older article for any reason. I have redirected your new article to creation-evolution controversy, which already deals with the topic of evolution and religious belief; feel free to edit that article instead. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-18 09:25Z

New contents in Creation-evolution controversy

It appears you were just directed to edit this article above, but you have some misperceptions about how wikipedia is intended to work. While we encourage every editor to be bold when editing wikipedia, there are some standards about the intent and content edits should have. Specifically two of the most important policies on wikipedia are no original research which is to say edits should not be ideas you have had for yourself, but rather information that can be attributed to reliable sources. Additionally, wikipedia has a policy on having a neutral point of view where all sides of an issue are treated fairly with due weight. Someone else has reverted your edit to that page, and I am merely notifying you why. If you have any questions please ask on my talk page, i kan reed 06:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Radha_Krishna.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Radha_Krishna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 01:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sita Ram.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sita Ram.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob^Talk 17:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]