Jump to content

User talk:Wisnie26

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Wisnie26! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 23:13, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Wisnie26, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Wisnie26! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of Borg 19:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Robert "Bob" Carlton Brown, II.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Robert "Bob" Carlton Brown, II.jpg, which you've attributed to Craig Saper. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Piotr Florczyk

[edit]

The article Piotr Florczyk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Piotr. Thank you for your comments on the Piotr Florczyk entry. Please allow me to justify the entry. When posting the entry, I did not intend to write a biography of this person. Instead, Florczyk (under Wikipedia guidelines) is viewed as "notable" because of his literary contributions, especially in the area of translation, which connects him to numerous other notable figures in Poland and the United States. Because of this sort of contribution, like hundreds of other entries long established on Wikipedia listed as "academics" and "creative professionals", secondary criticism of Florczyk's is irrelevant. It is true that some of the external links are not "independent", but others are reliable and offer significant coverage.

I am new to writing Wikipedia entries, and would appreciate your assistance in making this what you deem more worthy. The intention of Wikipedia, as I understand it, is a collective adding, contributing, and sharing. Thanks, [[User:Wisnie26 9:47 28, April 2016 (EST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisnie26 (talkcontribs)

Nomination of Piotr Florczyk for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piotr Florczyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Florczyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wisnie; please post (copy) your comment to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piotr Florczyk where the deletion discussion will be taking place. On my talk page it won't be seen by many. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:37, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]