User talk:Winterspell

This user may have left Wikipedia. Winterspell has not edited Wikipedia since 31 October 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Home

Talk

E-mail

Welcome!

Hello, Winterspell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Regards, Accurizer 11:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Kylie Minogue

Hello! I have created a Kylie Minogue WikiProject to help expanded and create articles concerning Minogue. Please feel free to join up. :) -- Underneath-it-All 19:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:GirlsAloud.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GirlsAloud.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Shadow Of The Day.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shadow Of The Day.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SimpsonsGreenDay.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SimpsonsGreenDay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SexyNoNoNo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SexyNoNoNo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ebttrt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ebttrt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:IrresistibleKylie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IrresistibleKylie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ITunes Originals - New Order

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ITunes Originals - New Order, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.discogs.com/release/1085736. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:New Order Originals.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:New Order Originals.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Duran Duran Essential.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful tip

Regarding your addition of review ratings to various articles: please keep in mind that the stars template should only be used for publications that actually use star ratings. Please see Template:Rating and WP:ALBUM#Professional reviews for more information. Just64helpin (talk) 00:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Doctor Who continuity (Partners In Crime)

Hi there. I can't speak for how the other Who articles are treated by their regular caretakers, but in removing the information I was attempting to make the article fall more in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trivia sections and continuity sections (what others might term fancruft), are generally frowned upon in Wikipedia articles. To my mind, in an article about a film or television programme, the text should focus more on the production, reaction, themes and analysis, and should always have real-world context. While articles in the early stages of development may contain information which does not easily fit elsewhere, this material should either be moved to the relevant section or removed entirely as the article matures. The information added to the article was also original research, as it was based upon editor observation and interpretation, rather than any independent secondary sources. This is also considered a no-no. While other Who articles might indeed contain this stuff, the Partners in Crime article is one which has been nominated for featured status, meaning it should reflect the best that Wikipedia has to offer. Stricter standards must therefore apply. I hope this explanation has been of some use to you, and I hope there are no hard feelings. All the best, Steve ^{T • C} 08:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, don't take my word for it; I'm nobody :). Feel free to make a compelling case for the inclusion of the information on the article's talk page, with no hard feelings from this end. We can all be civil about this kind of thing and you might even change someone's mind. I'll only add that, where it has been accepted that the continuity sections are perfectly OK, they must still be cited to secondary sources. See Voyage of the Damned (Doctor_Who)#Continuity for an example where every item in the list has an appropriate citation. All the best, Steve ^{T • C} 08:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lost?

I didn't mean to revert that. Sorry. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 09:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yeah I never thought on that. I can't say why I added it with an exclamation mark in the first place, since the source I got it from was the Official Charts and they did not have any punctuation mark for it. 216.221.108.75 (talk) 00:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Give Me Just A Little More Time Chairmen.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Give Me Just A Little More Time Chairmen.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Give Me Just A Little More Time Chairmen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Give Me Just A Little More Time Chairmen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:SexyNoNoNo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SexyNoNoNo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Confide in Me: The Irresistible Kylie

The article Confide in Me: The Irresistible Kylie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 00:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ITunes Originals – New Order

The article ITunes Originals – New Order has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish that this meets WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:40, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Did It Again.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Did It Again.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Give Me Just A Little More Time (Kylie Minogue version).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Give Me Just A Little More Time (Kylie Minogue version).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:What Kind Of Fool.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:What Kind Of Fool.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:GirlsAloudBandImage.jpg

The file File:GirlsAloudBandImage.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Compressed, blurry. Better version available locally as File:GirlsAloudMontage.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 00:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]