User talk:Windowsfan1219

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Prescott, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Prescott was changed by Windowsfan1219 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855114 on 2011-01-29T17:05:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AnomieBOT CategoryCleaner[edit]

I have restarted the bot; your complaint at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/CategoryCleaner what so vague it was impossible to know what you might have been complaining about, and both of the edits for that task in January 2011 were exactly correct. If you have a real concern, please elaborate here. If you are just screwing around, please stop or you may wind up blocked for disruption. Anomie ⚔ 13:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Instruments signing key controversy[edit]

I don't know why you left the edit summary you did, but your change didn't affect the keys at all, instead adding an error to the article.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roozie12 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dylan620 ^{(t • c)} 23:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Roozie12 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 12:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]