User talk:Windows55
Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #22 |
Long saga of warnings and multiple blocks for administrator blocking
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.
Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled. If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.
Warnings[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 18:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Rick James[edit]Your recent edit to Rick James (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC) This is your last warning.The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Right-handed, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Parthi talk/contribs 00:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC) Your recent edit to Spinach (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC) You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. – Ian Cairns 00:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)Your recent edit to Thunderstorm (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC) January 2007[edit]Tropical cyclone[edit]Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Insanephantom (my Editor Review) 13:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with the page 2007 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Fram 14:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC) April 2007[edit]April 07[edit]
October 2007[edit]Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Robert Fleming Gourlay worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dreadstar † 18:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC) November 2007[edit]Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Apricot. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 18:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC) This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Prince Albert piercing, you will be blocked from editing. --Oxymoron83 18:28, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --82.203.139.241 17:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC) December 2007[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bunyip, Victoria. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 18:47, 18 December 2007 (UTC) February 2008[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Urdu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC) March 2008[edit]Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dog health, you will be blocked from editing. WebHamster 16:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Your recent edit to The Big Ear (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 13:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2008[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 13:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Your recent edits in AH-64 Apache today were vandalism and has been undone. Continued edits such as these will result in this IP address being blocked from editing again. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC) You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
October 2008[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ramones has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 17:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC) The recent edit you made to Treaty of Paris (1783) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Anonymous101 (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC) November 2008[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Teenage pregnancy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 17:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC) The recent edit you made to Teenage pregnancy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC) January 2009[edit]The recent edit you made to William DuVall constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Gail (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to William DuVall. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Gail (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Moby-Dick, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Moby-Dick was changed by 142.227.152.4 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-01-15T14:00:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC) February 2009[edit]
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Nintendo GameCube. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Closedmouth (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC) This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Nintendo GameCube. -- Mentifisto 14:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC) March 2009[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to ABC Family, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Ian Cairns (talk) 18:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC) On reconsideration, this is a habitual vandal account - so schoolblock To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.
Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), anonymous editing from your school, library or institution's IP address may be disabled. You continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address is probably also disabled. If editing is required for class projects, please have your teacher or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. Thank you. |
A Krabby Patty for you at the Krusty Krab!
[edit]Here is a delicious, mouthwatering Krabby Patty served at the Krusty Krab! Windows55 (2) (talk) 17:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC) |
Shop at Acme for weekly deals!
[edit]Shop at Acme for weekly deals! | |
Go shopping at Acme for weekly deals, including the deliciously secret Acme brand products and more at the Delaware Valley's famous grocery store! Windows55 (2) (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Animal Alphabet
[edit]A tag has been placed on Animal Alphabet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TomCat4680 (talk) 02:53, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The article Animal Alphabet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Long-term sub-stub with no references and no assertion of notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger One ping only 05:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Windows55, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
SummerPhDv2.0 01:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)