User talk:Windmill 000eh

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Windmill 000eh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not Sunholm

Decline reason:

Following on from the ANI thread you have been blocked by a checkuser as you are using the same IP. — Woody (talk) 11:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

nah, my IP isn't the same as Sunholm's or M62Manchester's... it's different, and different to Solumeiras.

I will go

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Windmill 000eh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can I exert a right to vanish whatever that is?? One more thing, Solumeiras isn't a sockpuppet!

Decline reason:

Ok — B (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

THIS USER HAS LEFT WIKIPEDIA.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Windmill 000eh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, it's not really an unblock request, but please read the following information, this is probably of some interest to you. I am personally sorry for the Solumeiras stupidity.

Decline reason:

So Noted. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 17:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Solumeiras is a group account with a shared password, and the owner of it has been recruiting meatpuppets (like this guy), so not every account was him. Any claims about him editing in 2005 are false, these are simply because he knows someone else who edits the site. Also, if you see the name SunStar Net, that is not affiliated with the owner of that particular site.

I personally want to turn around on here, I've been editing at another non-Wikimedia wiki for some time now. Anyway, I have been making good edits under various IPs at www.mediawiki.org

I know I will never pass RfA here or anything like that, but I never intend to run for it. I was happy being an editor here, but since you have indefinitely blocked me - fine, I can use this site for research but I am not permitted to create a new account here as far as I am aware.

I am dreadfully sorry for his behaviour. Sunholm does have autism, it is confirmed that he is autistic. However, as many autistic people do, they have interests which are (according to books on the subject), "all-consuming", then move on to something else - which Sunholm has done. He is not deliberately being malicious or offensive, but he has learning difficulties, and it seems wikis have not worked out for him.

I know Sunholm off-wiki, and am dreadfully sorry for this. He's now gone back to his old interest in games.

BTW, "Sunholm" should really have been a {{usernameblock}} anyway.

I cannot apologise enough to Metros, Sarah, Lar and anyone affected by him. He hasn't come back since March, and probably has invoked his right to vanish.

I also apologise to Nwwaew for his recruiting of meatpuppets to BJAODN.

With regard to his IP addresses, he mostly used open proxies or insecure wireless points (like the 82.42.237.84 IP, which was up until now an insecure wireless point).

Sorry for all the trouble caused.

Matt