User talk:Willy turner

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Willy turner may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --W.marsh 23:14, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just moved it to your user page, at User:Willy turner. Biographies in the main article space need to comply with the WP:BIO guideline, while on your user page you can basically write about yourself however you want. So there's no problem with what you wrote, you just put it in slightly the wrong place, so I fixed it. --W.marsh 23:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's somewhat of a complicated issue, but most people feel that Wikipedia is only for writing about topics that have been covered somewhere else, e.g. in newspaper articles, books, etc. Otherwise there's really no way for us to realistically check whether what you're writing about is true. See WP:BIO, that defines what biographical articles are about on Wikipedia. The idea that you can write about absolutely anything is not really correct, sorry. --W.marsh 23:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regional Power

We need your opinion respect the inclusion of Argentina one more time, since the fanatic is back.

kardrak 4:45 UTC 11 december 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kardrak (talk • contribs) 04:43, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gape shot

You have recently re-created the article Gape shot. This was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article: if you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review.

This article was deleted after an Articles for deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gape shot. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 00:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Population of Isiro, DRC

Willy, I saw that you added the information that Isiro (in Democratic Republic of Congo) has a population of 81,000. Could you add a reference to the article showing where you got this information? Or tell me and I'll add it. Thanks. Dblomgren 05:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adygea

Hi! I had to revert your edit to Adygea (formatting the population number in the infobox) because this number is used further down to calculate population density. Formatted numbers cause the density calculation to error out.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 02:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Südweststadion

Hi Willy turner. First: Sorry for my bad English! Now my quastion: Why you remoted Südweststadion from this list? There is definite a capacity of 41,383. Look just on the homepage of the city Ludwigshafen. "Fassungsvermögen" means "capacity". In the stadium plays FSV Oggersheim (German Oberliga) ([1]). It wasn't just a joke, but a usefull addition. --Kuemmjen 22:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand, that Olympiastadion München is remoted, because it's still unused. --Kuemmjen 22:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added Südweststadion again. There is definite a capacity of 41,383. I asked the Club, too. --Kuemmjen 10:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:B stadium 01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:B stadium 01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopters template

Good work. I made a comment in the template talk about the inclusion of the AH-1, which I think is debatable. Can you also fix the capitalisation? I amended the template, and it might be easier to transclude the template than to copy-and-paste it into the articles. --Guinnog 06:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Modern Attack Helicopters}} should do it. --Guinnog 06:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the noinclude (I'm not 100% sure why you were using it in the template to begin with) in the template. And have included the template in the helicopter articles. You might want to do the same thing for the SSBN template you are now working on. Megapixie 07:47, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CVN and Typhoon infoboxes

Good job adding the "currently in use" information to the various CVN and Typhoon articles. But that probably needs to be in a template, and not on each individual article like here and here. This way, any maintenance only has to be done in one spot, instead of many articles. Also, stop in over on Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history, there are probably editors there who can help with any template questions you have. Thanks for improving Wikipedia! — MrDolomite • Talk 11:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Template:4.5 and 5th generation Fighter Aircraft

Template:4.5 and 5th generation Fighter Aircraft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.. This nomination was made following discussion about the template at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft. When creating templates that affect the Project, please discuss them at the Project first. Thanks. — Akradecki 15:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Modern Attack Helicopters

Template:Modern Attack Helicopters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.. This nomination was made following discussion about the template at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft. --Guinnog 16:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:DSC04326.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC04326.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Thanks for your new userbox! I like it, and supports it. --Beyond silence 15:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alistair McConnachie

Notability of Alistair McConnachie

A tag has been placed on Alistair McConnachie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Hi, I added it because he meets none of the other notability guidlines for inclusion in wikipedia. The other small party leaders that are included (and there are only two or three of them) are notable as a result of being elected to the Scottish Parliament or have gained notability from some other activity. If you feel that there is some notable reason to keep Mr McConnachie's article please detail them on my talk page. Ta.GiollaUidir 23:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi. please explain why you added notability tag to Alistair McConnachie article. There are articles on the leaders of other very small scottish political parties. Please explain why he is significantly less notable than them. thanks.

Other than nominating himself for election he has done nothing of note. Robin Harper, Tommy Sheridan and Colin Fox are leaders of small parties that have been very much in the public eye over the past 4-8years. Plus, the onus is not to show his relative notability to other politicians-the onus is to prove that he has done enough of note to deserve his own article.GiollaUidir 00:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regional power

Thanks for your note on my talk page. I put your note and my answer in article's talk page. I think its good to have discussion there so other intrested wikipedians can join too. cheersFarmanesh 03:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to comment on my talk page: Oops, sorry, missed that earlier. The only thing I can recommend would be to have the page semi-protected at WP:RPP. If someone's really dedicated to editing an article even when they've been told they're doing it wrong several times, the only ways to stop them are a civil discussion, protection, or a block. Since the discussion isn't working so well, that leaves us with the last two. Hersfold ^(talk/work) 21:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Willy. I just want to point out that the template "border" was created to improve the looking of certain images of white background, to help these images to be noticable different from the page background. This is the case of the Flag of Japan. Look the difference:

Japan
Japan

Without the border, the flags seems to be just a red circle, not the actual flag of Japan. That's why I added back the border template in the article regional power. Thank you. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 07:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Willy. I wasn't aware about the position problem, and it is because it doesn't affect Internet Explorer. I opened the article with Firefox and then, I was able to see what you mentioned. I'm not sure how we can fix it, but I think there's some bordered versions of the Flag of Japan. Thanks! AlexCovarrubias

^{( Talk? )} 00:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Willy. Your changes in the Brazil section were reverted by Limongi. I tried to help by reverting to your version, but he reverted again. See what I mean? They are only using boosterism practices to "talk up" Brazil. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 17:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Mind explaining to me how direct democracy and a technocratic world government can co-exist? --BlarghHgralb 05:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Regional power good article nomination

Use the {{cite web}} method, or {{cite news}} for news articles. If you dont know when the reference was added, putting down todays date is fine. - • The Giant Puffin • 12:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You dont repeat all the code. Say you named one "essex" so it says <ref name="essex">{{cite..., the next time you use that reference you just put <ref name="essex"/> - • The Giant Puffin • 13:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor's Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For your efforts of improving the Superpower article.

User:Daniel Chiswick 4 June, 2007.

Your American military uniform question.

You asked about U.S. Marines and soldiers wearing the American flag patch on their sleeve. U.S. Marines do not wear this patch; the only sewn-on adornments on any uniforms are name and service tapes, velcro patches for IR tags, and enlisted rank insignia on service and dress uniforms. The Army wears the flag with the stars and stripes on the upper right of the flag because the stars always are at the side of the flag touching the flagpole and, as soldiers are walking forward, it gives the flag the appearance of moving forward with them as though it were on a flagpole. Why they don't just put it on the left is beyond me, but the flag on the right shoulder is the way they've done it for longer than I've been around and is probably the way it will continue to be done for quite some time. If this did not adequately answer your question or you have any others, feel free to message me back on my talk page and I will be more than happy to answer your question or direct you to an article on Wikipedia that can. ZachPG 22:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bearnstar

		Bearnstar for comic asides
		I wanted to award you a barnstar for making me laugh, but unfortunately it was eaten by a bear. Rockpocket 18:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your userboxes

Your userbox Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Willy turner/Userboxes/christian homophobia is up for deletion. Please offer your opinion on the discussion.--Sefringle^Talk 01:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

anti-censorship userbox

The deletion of the template you inquired about on the help desk is now under discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 19. DES ^(talk) 00:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Your latest comments at Talk:Regional power regarding Argentina and Argentine users were uncalled for and rather uncivil. Your latest edit summary was also insulting. Please do not do that anymore. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 12:00, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mearns Castle High School

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mearns Castle High School, by SteelersFan UK06 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mearns Castle High School fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

fails second sentence of WP:N - The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mearns Castle High School, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Mearns Castle High School itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Tag

The above bot contacted you regarding the speedy delete tag i placed on Mearns Castle High School. As I have since realised, I placed the incorrect tag on the article - it should have been prod'd. Please accept my appologies, you should have received this:

Mearns Castle High School

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Mearns Castle High School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Thank You, SteelersFan UK06 02:17, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:40841669_livstadium_inside203.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:40841669_livstadium_inside203.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 06:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gest estadio olimpico.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Gest estadio olimpico.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Alligator

Hi! I noticed you recently added a fact to Alligator, complete with a reference and everything. However, I'm not sure if its a very useful statement. What size of alligator has this bite force? What size of truck falling how far down a cliff is the bite force being compared to? Does the alligator have the entire force of a falling truck in one square inch of its bite? Does your average truck have the same force per square inch as an average alligator bite? As you can see, the statement you added to the article isn't very specific. Please improve it using the source you got it from, or remove the fact. Alligator needs a lot of work, though, so if you're interested in contributing to the article, please continue to do so! Enuja 23:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jaza'ir Farasan

Thanx for starting the article Jaza'ir Farasan, its already written , see :(Farasan Islands). thank you anyways Ammar (^Talk - ^{Don't Talk}) 12:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of stadiums by capacity

Hi, You recently removed Strahov Stadium from the List of Stadia, due to its apparent disuse. After viewing the main page for this stadium, it is not clear that the stadium is no longer in use. You obviously know more about the stadium than myself, so it would be useful if you could rework the page accordingly. Cheers. Toon05 18:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

P.S. Come on Newcastle!

Chechen War is a part of War on Terror!

George W. Bush said so, when he called Russia "America's partner" in the War on Terror! And are you implying Basaev's henchmen are not terrorists? Because the families of those they murdered in Beslan, Nord-Ost, the apartment bombings, and their other terrorist crimes might disagree with you on that! Just don't edit the War on Terrorism article anymore! You obviously don't know much about the subject! --24.87.7.43 00:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for Willy turner: 15% for major edits and 80% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 5 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 11:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second that emotion. You've been adding lots of articles to WikiProject Politics, which is great...but it would be much better if you did so with an edit summary, even a simple one like "+WPP" -Pete (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

199.60.112.15

Thank you for making a report about 199.60.112.15 (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. TigerShark 20:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Italy/Regional Power link

http://www.carabinieri.it/Internet/Editoria/Rassegna+Arma/2001/3/Studi/02_De_Marchi.htm

Besides this link, I think Italy should be included as a Regional Power, based on the definition itself and by comparing it with other lesser powers that are considered Regional. Italy is part of the Contact Group for Kososvo, along France, USA, UK, Russia and Germany. It has regional influence in the balkans, note that Greece or Turkey are not on this group and are close to Kosovo too. If it wasn't a reginal power, Italy wouldn't be included.
Italy is also founder member of Central Europe Initiative and leader of that group. It has considerable influence in countries like Poland, which is closer to Germany, even in germanic Austria, Italy has great influence. Slovenian Air defence is done by Italy, Russia's third biggest partner is Italy, and so on.... It isn't a Regional Power?

ACamposPinho 1:53, 27 July 2007

Image:-BB48BC80-4A6D-4ACB-938C-04A377D67DF0-.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:-BB48BC80-4A6D-4ACB-938C-04A377D67DF0-.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 16:04, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Ukraina Stadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ukraina Stadium.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Icon-waffen-ss-pic.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Icon-waffen-ss-pic.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stade marrakech11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stade marrakech11.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:01, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stadion lecha poznan10.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stadion lecha poznan10.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:05, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tanger p.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tanger p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:13, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Warszawa 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Warszawa 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:12455.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:12455.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Deportivo Cali A.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Deportivo Cali A.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:C1b3ef8a.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:C1b3ef8a.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alistair McConnachie

A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article Alistair McConnachie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Oo7565 20:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Olympic Stadium Wroclaw.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Olympic Stadium Wroclaw.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grp181t.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grp181t.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Grp214t.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grp214t.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nsk olimpiyskyi01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nsk olimpiyskyi01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:UK Socialist parties

Category:UK Socialist parties, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VAlenciaCFestadiox1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VAlenciaCFestadiox1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pt-2735-75dpi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pt-2735-75dpi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pt-2745-75dpi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pt-2745-75dpi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/United Nations Parliamentary Assembly

Hello, I have created an article about the UN Parliamentary Assembly, a proposed world body that would be similar to Europarl. Please review and vote on the WP:FAC nomination. Thanks, Sarsaparilla (talk) 01:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Direct democracy userbox

I haven't edited it, because it's in your own userspace and I could be wrong, but I assume that the Direct democracy userbox links to the wrong article. Direct Democracy is a group within the Conservative Party, whereas direct democracy is the concept of policy-specific mandates granted by means of referenda, etc. Bastin 14:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julius Gius

I just went a removed a ton of cruft from the article then wikified and cleaned what was left. I'm pretty sure it passes WP:N now, assuming that the references are reliable. Just thought you might wanna' take a look at it now. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:29, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

The Entertainers (NUFC) is up for Afd MickMacNee (talk) 05:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC) MickMacNee (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saving your ITN faith

My pleasure. ;) --Step hen 02:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

100,000 seat sporting venues

I remember you started a bunch of articles on the capacities of all the stadiums. I've started a similar list, but have expanded it to all sporting venues, including motor racing and horse racing. The list is currently in my sandbox here. Can you take a look at it to see if I am missing any stadiums or anything else? Thanks. Patken4 (talk) 21:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV-pushers reported for checkuser

Hi there, I have noticed that a lot of our POV-pushing friends are almost identical to one another, so I have reported them for checkuser here. Let me know if you know any more users that could be added to that request.--Sir Anon (talk) 11:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well that didn't prove anything, but now there is another issue of User:Top Gun being back and he does not seem to understand WP:V, from my previous interaction with him I have little hope of a fruitful discussion. So if he still persists and we're getting nowhere I plan to file a case with WP:MEDCAB, as I have not carefully looked through the rest of this poor excuse of an article it would be great if you could participate.--Sir Anon (talk) 10:48, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:B stadium 03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:B stadium 03.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Power in International Relations

WikiProject

Hello, as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Power in international relations we'd like your help in improving the supporting sections of the Potential superpowers article. Best wishes! --Hobie Hunter (talk) 01:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, as a member of WikiProject Power in international relations, I'd like to invite you to come back and work on the project. There's still a lot of work to be done and we'd all appreciate your contributions. Please come back. --Hobie (talk) 02:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Middle Power CIAOnet

Hello Willy Turner, I have recently been working on cleaning up references at the Middle Power article. Two of them point to articles only available via cianonet.org 1 2. And it seems like you were the one that added them during May 2007 1 2. Could you by any chance provide authors, titles and dates of publication for these two articles? =Species8473= ^(talk) 09:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to talk pages

Your edits such as [2] are lighting up a good few watch pages . Please leave an edit summary Gnevin (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Introducing WikiProject United States Government...

Hello Willy turner,

Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief.

Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying.

Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This message has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot on behalf of WikiProject United States Government.
You have received it because you are a member of a related WikiProject or you have said you are interested in your userspace.
Message written by Leonard^Bloom and Diligent Terrier.

Help us get the project off the ground and flying.

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 19:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested

Willy, another user suggested at Talk:List of American football stadiums by capacity that we add a column for the record attendance for each stadium. Since you have done a lot of work on these lists, I figure you're the perfect person to give your input. Thanks! Patken4 (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should indoor velodromes be counted as indoor arenas?

It all depends on the size of the velodrome. Usually, indoor arenas are built for basketball and ice hockey and are much smaller than stadiums. If the velodrome is smaller than a regulation football pitch, I would say yes. However if it isn't, it gets more difficult. It's not really a stadium. I suppose we could call it an indoor arena, but larger domed stadiums could be said to be indoor arenas. Patken4 (talk) 22:13, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it could. It's border line, but some of the photos I've seen make it look like it's smaller than a football pitch. Thanks! Patken4 (talk) 22:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Thompson Productions

On March 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Thompson Productions, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Walvis Ridge

A tag has been placed on Walvis Ridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DougsTech (talk) 00:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CPB userbox

thumb|Hammer and Dove

This user supports the
Communist Party of Britain.

Would it be a good idea to include the hammer and dove in this ? In which case, should the colour scheme be changed? Replace the H & S with the H & D or have the H & D on the right? any thoughts ?
☭ мдснєтє тдлк^ЅТЦФФ 17:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YNOT News

Could use some help concerning bullying and an articles for deletion page at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/YNOT_News . Help. I feel like I am swimming upstream against those against adding information here. LaserVaZer (talk) 15:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Cady Stanton

I noticed your recent edit: WikiProject Politics|class=A|importance=low. LOW? LOW? Obviously your view of the American 19th century efforts to win civil rights for both women and blacks greatly differs from mine. This is an excellent example of why I oppose all efforts to rank articles. WBardwin (talk) 01:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yikes -- WBardwin, this isn't a reason to oppose ranking articles -- it's a reason to get involved in the process! When I see a ranking, I take it to mean, "If I were to raise an issue with this article at the WikiProject, how quickly would the members rush to address it?" It's not a measure of true "importance," but a measure of "relevance" or "interest" (to the community).

When you see a tragedy like this, find a more relevant wikiproject -- e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject Human rights -- to rank it "top" in. (or fix it yourself -- as I just did for you)

Sorry to sound condescending. I just care deeply about the ranking endeavour so I get preachy at times.

Willy turner, thanks for letting me squat on your talk page. Agradman ^talk/_contribs 17:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have been uneasy about Wikipedia ranking since I first noticed the effort some years back. My time as an organization auditor taught me that some tasks may simply be "wasted" effort. Rankings are soooooo entirely subjective, are based solely on the opinion of the group (always very small compared to Wiki editor totals) of interested reviewers, and have no underlying reliability as a measurement. (Reminds me of some academic conferences!) Comparing rankings between various Wiki projects is also impossible. I think the featured article system, both as it presently exists and with improvements/refinements, could be a better way of selecting article importance and identifying good encyclopedia work. Sorry, Willy turner, to hi-jack your talk page for a philosophical argument. Best wishes to you both. WBardwin (talk) 05:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roe v. Wade

I'm glad to see you've updated the "importance" tags at Roe v. Wade. Would you mind if I promoted its importance for WP:LAW to "top"? ... because Roe v. Wade is one of the most "famous"/"infamous" cases around, and every American knows its name, even if s/he can't name any other case. As a member of WP:LAW I think of it as the "ambassador" of our project to the non-legal world.

Thanks. Agradman ^talk/_contribs 17:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, good point. On further reflection I see it's also ranked by WP:SCOTUS (U.S. Supreme Court cases) as "high", and that's probably a better solution. I'll keep it as-is. Agradman ^talk/_contribs 17:53, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reborn doll and sociology

Reborn doll is related to family (parenting) and leisure, and all of those are of interest to sociology. Granted, it is a fringe subject of low importance, but if it wasn't related, I wouldn't have allowed my students to edit this article for our sociology course :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page-moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 01:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see three of them actually...I'll fix:

Health care politics→Health policy Done
Government of Bhutan→Politics of Bhutan Done
Government of Burma→Politics of Burma Done

Let me know if you need further assistance. DMacks (talk) 04:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wage slavery

I see that you just rated Wage slavery. I was wondering if I could entice you to comment on the Talk:Wage slavery#Potentially contentious sentence removal -- 1869 NYT quote, just because you're an uninvolved party. (No problem if you can't.)

CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am both agog and aghast at your decision! :-)

But seriously, may I trouble you to elucidate your reasoning for this? You, sir, have demoted it.
--NBahn (talk) 03:42, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

adding wikiproject templates

If you're going to be adding dozens of wikiproject templates, could you please mark the edits as minor? As it stands you're clogging up my (and other people's I imagine) watchlist with edits that are completely uninteresting to almost everybody. john k (talk) 14:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, seriously, is it really that hard to mark such edits as minor? john k (talk) 18:54, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reassessments

Hello, Willy turner. I noticed that some days ago, you had reassessed several politics-related articles falling within WP:SWEDEN, by knocking them down 1-3 steps on the assessment scale. While some of the B-class articles were not quite up to my understanding of B-class, I think you assessed the articles 1-2 steps too low, and I base that on experience from assessments in several projects. Please refer to this scale and notice that even C-class articles can have significant deficiencies. For example, assessing articles as "stub-class" is really saying that it has almost no content at all, and definitely none of any value. I'm not going to take the line "don't reassess articles if you're not a member of a project" (because in most cases articles can be assessed/reassessed for quality for a all projects at once), but I would ask you not to apply the quality scale in a very different way from how project members do. I wouldn't have bothered with this comment if it was just one or two borderline cases (start/C or C/B), but you seem to be systematically too low. Please notice that due to bot assessment, there are a lot of stub-classed-marked articles out there which are above the definition of stub-class, and a lot of start-class articles that have never been reconsidered for C-class since the introduction of that level. But I would also like to say that it general, it is very commendable of you to add project tags and to assess articles - there is a lot of this work that still (or always) needs to be done! Regards, Tomas e (talk) 12:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Ann Dunham

Call me crazy, but what does Ann Dunham have to do with the politics WikiProject? Did you read the article? Viriditas (talk) 22:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rights of Englishmen

I am very surprised at your importance rating edit for this article. The depth and breadth of importance of this topic (if not the current state of the article) make it at least as significant as many of those listed at . It is the foundation of the modern British system, a major factor in the cause of the American Revolution, and has therefore had worldwide influences that are still felt today. I plan on reverting, but would like to hear your rationale, first. Shoreranger (talk) 13:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Gwen Media logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gwen Media logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent changes!

Thanks for your recent edits!! - You helped the world today in some way... maybe a little bit, but wrong is doing nothing at all. 189.217.171.135 (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PORNO

Do wish to be in the WP:PORN Project? You have made a related edit in you're Contribs for the last 500 edits. May I remove you? -Stillwaterising (talk) 06:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added a footnote after your name explaining you intentions. You can edit it if you wish. -Stillwaterising (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icon-waffen-ss-pic.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Icon-waffen-ss-pic.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sandstein 18:18, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject banners

I'll stop doing it and sorry, didn't think it would do any harm. But you can't block me because you see it as "vandalism", which it wasn't! --TIAYN (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:12439 file.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:12439 file.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:12439 file.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:12439 file.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:19, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

nested parameter

Hi, concerning this edit of yours I would like to inform you that nested parameter is not used anymore. Now banners are automatically nested when inside the shell. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 23:34, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Willy turner! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Francesco D'Aniello - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Maan Al-Sanea - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Third World Media logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Third World Media logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:14, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory Dark-Spears

Next time when you provide information for a director's work on a video, try researching the said project they did, instead of providing inaccurate information. If you bothered to even check the article for the video, you would see he directed the Spears video in November 1999(aired in 12/1999), NOT 2000. It greatly helps when editors cover all their bases in submissions instead of carelessly adding incorrect things without checking their validity first.Carmaker1 (talk) 21:21, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Now

Edits like these are not anyway for an established editor to behave around here. Jmlk 1 7 17:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Strong Word Rant. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 18:25, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of stadiums by capacity

I don't think I'm getting my point across correctly on the List of stadiums by capacity talk page. I'm not purposely trying to provoke you or be a muppet or a dick or anything else. I'm trying to set precedence for editors who are going to update their favorite stadium's new attendance record whenever it is set, that this has already been discussed and a conclusion by consensus reached. I agree with what you've done/said, but some users are going to do what they want, no matter what it does to the project. People are going to ignore any statement saying record attendance should not be included. Every weekend, we're going to have to revert their changes, to the point of frustration. I know, because all last fall I spent reverting user's changes whenever a stadium set a new record. A particularly determined user may even try to point out that record attendance is the same thing as the maximum number of people a stadium can hold. I just don't want to repeat last fall and all the changes I had to make. Thanks! Patken4 (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck on the degree! There are currently 66 people that have the page on their watchlist, so hopefully more people will be willing to help. Some people who make the change won't come back after it's been reverted, some will. I guess it's just something that will have to be dealt with as long as anonymous users can make changes. There is List of NCAA Division I FBS football stadiums that does have a column for record attendances, so I think that can suffice.

As for your question of how a stadium can hold more people than is safe is simply down to Standing-room only, a mostly American/Canadian concept. Behind the last row of most sections, stadiums will have room for one or two rows of people who are willing to stand to watch the game. I have watched several games from this vantage point in my life. I have been to Michigan Stadium, in fact. It's been several years, but I think I remember a row of people behind the last row of the main section. This is different than standing sections, like in Germany, where seats are taken out and spectators allowed to stand the whole time, despite what the SRO article says. SRO is really a row or two behind the last row of seats. I've been to a couple stadiums in England, but never saw anything like a standing row at the stadium, even though the concept might work. Most SRO places only add about 1,000-2,000 people to the attendance. Cowboys Stadium is an extreme example, and can probably better be described as a glorified bar area inside the stadium (it's in fact called a party deck by the Cowboys). Of the 30,000 tickets available, only a couple thousand of that figure could actually see the game. The rest would have to watch tv monitors to know what's going on. When the capacity of a stadium is quoted for American/Canadian stadiums, they really mean the seating capacity, or how many seats are in the stadium. I don't think I've seen a SRO capacity quoted for a venue. This explains why you can have more people in the stadium than there are seats.

I actually go to Skyscrapers.com to see if there any new stadiums where construction has started. I then usually use a Google search to find more information, but it has been pretty good in the past. Thanks! Patken4 (talk) 01:59, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sockpuppetry blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Willy turner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. I only edit when logged in. And recently have only been editing stadium-related pages

Decline reason:

See my note below. TN X Man 22:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Willy turner (talk) 21:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-ip|1=85.211.219.42|2={{checkuserblock}}: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The abominable Wiki troll]]|3=Avraham}} Willy turner (talk) 21:55, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{adminhelp}} Regarding being blocked. Willy turner (talk) 22:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a note on Avraham's talk page, as he is the one that placed the block. Unfortunately, an admin cannot lift a checkuserblock - it must be undone by a checkuser. I'm going to decline your first request for now, since the second one is the relevant one. TN X Man 22:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Lifting rangeblock a bit early.

Request handled by: jpgordon^{::==( o )}

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Response

Hey, Willy. I noticed you set up a few questions on Talk:List of European stadiums by capacity. I have answered some of them so I'd like to ask have you seen them? The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Merchant City Music

The article Merchant City Music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a company, but does not indicate how or why the subject is notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanruvan (talk) 20:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lansdowne Road stadium projected.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lansdowne Road stadium projected.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abbywinters logo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abbywinters logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arena Banja Luka

The article Arena Banja Luka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of existence

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 09:32, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 21Sextury

The article 21Sextury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Run of the mill, non-notable web and vid. Nominated for only a few awards. No assertion of having won any. Article appears to be more of a P.R. piece than an encyclopedia article. WP:DEL#REASON #4. Contains a number of inappropriate links, per WP:ELNO which I will delete, but you can review them in the page's history o see if my judgment seems inaccurate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David in DC (talk) 17:09, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 21Sextury for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 21Sextury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/21Sextury until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. David in DC (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:21 Sextury logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:21 Sextury logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Video Marc Dorcel logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Video Marc Dorcel logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links

Per List of largest European companies by revenue, I highly recommend User:Anomie/linkclassifier.css / User:Anomie/linkclassifier.js (both required for functionality). It will highlight links to disambiguation pages, along with tons of other highly useful stuff. Indispensable. Hope this helps — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also recommend archiving your talk page. A bit hard to navigate. Cheers! — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of largest European companies by revenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to CRH, ING, TUI, Continental, ACS, Anglo American, La Poste, SSE, ENI, National Grid and Daimler

List of largest European manufacturing companies by revenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to CRH, Continental and Daimler

List of European financial services companies by revenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to ING and Prudential

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of largest manufacturing companies by revenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Continental (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of largest manufacturing companies by revenue may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|[Wilmar International]] || Food & Beverages|| 44,710 || {{flagcountry|Singapore}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of mechanical, electrical and electronic equipment manufacturing companies by revenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Continental and Sharp

List of largest manufacturing companies by revenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sharp

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of largest oil and gas companies by revenue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of largest financial services companies by revenue, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ING and Prudential (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of largest European manufacturing companies by revenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Eaton, Wolseley, Merck, Linde, Rio Tinto, Exor and Carlsberg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arena Ponte Preta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arena Ponte Preta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arena Ponte Preta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 02:50, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of largest financial services companies by revenue, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ANZ and Onex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Video Marc Dorcel logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Video Marc Dorcel logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of exports of the United Kingdom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tyre and Combustion engine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Billions not Millions

Hello,

Recently I have made a page on List of exports of Poland; the same source of data you and I used has its figures in B (eg. $156B) and not in millions. Please could you tell me why you had changed the unit to Millions, as OEC says they are in B (Billions). I am not sure if I or you are wrong. Thank you - have a good day.

Arbustum (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of exports of China

added links pointing to Video recorder, Printer and Tyre

List of exports of Germany

added links pointing to Transmission, Printer and Combustion engine

List of exports of Japan

added links pointing to Video recorder, Printer and Tyre

List of exports of Italy

added links pointing to Transmission and Pipes

List of exports of the United States

added links pointing to Combustion engine and Planes

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Average attendances of European football clubs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Average attendances of European football clubs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Average attendances of European football clubs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MER-C 05:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pt-2745-75dpi.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pt-2745-75dpi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sandstein 19:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pt-2745-75dpi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pt-2745-75dpi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Widow Productions logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Black Widow Productions logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of countries by telecommunications equipment exports

The article List of countries by telecommunications equipment exports has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dated list which appears to be a product of original research based on 2012 data. No encyclopedic value at this time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of countries by maize exports

The article List of countries by maize exports has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

OR based on 2012 data; also appears to be part of a walled garden around The Observatory of Economic Complexity.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of exports of the United States

The article List of exports of the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable & out of date. Part of a promo walled garden around The Observatory of Economic Complexity.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Willy turner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Willy turner. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pornproject logo.jpg

The file File:Pornproject logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 09:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Combat Zone logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Combat Zone logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Devil's Film logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Devil's Film logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wicked Pictures logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wicked Pictures logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Private Media Group logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Private Media Group logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Digital Playground logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Digital Playground logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Elegant Angel logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elegant Angel logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Evil Angel Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evil Angel Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anabolic logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anabolic logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Digital Sin logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Digital Sin logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Extreme Associates logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Extreme Associates logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Singa Mwambe

The article Singa Mwambe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No WP:SIGCOV located on a search. Kept finding stuff about an orchestra, and even when I added "Linafoot" I got nothing but WP mirrors.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:50, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Singa Mwambe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Singa Mwambe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singa Mwambe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Naughty America logo-en.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Naughty America logo-en.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Khartoum 3

Hello, Willy turner,

Thank you for creating Khartoum 3.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Seems notable, good sourcing used, but requires an expansion. Only a few lines of text used

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Oaktree b (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Willy turner. Thank you for your work on Khartoum 3. User:Oaktree b, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please expand the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Oaktree b (talk) 21:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scouts 2001:2020:333:D7FF:0:0:8F4:B9A7 (talk) 12:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:CONCACAF Gold Cup stadiums has been nominated for deletion

Category:CONCACAF Gold Cup stadiums has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 18:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]