User talk:William Krinning

May 2016

Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Edith Wharton has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:20, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of elections in 1860. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Peter Sam Fan 16:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to United States presidential election, 1860 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dcirovic (talk) 16:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to D. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gadmosakontrrevolutsionerebulebisnairebisatvisatso

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Gadmosakontrrevolutsionerebulebisnairebisatvisatso, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Peter Sam Fan 14:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Gadmosakontrrevolutsionerebulebisnairebisatvisatso. Peter Sam Fan 14:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]