User talk:Will bcfc

Discuss anything here.

Welcome!

Hello, Will bcfc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Scientizzle 00:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pidgeon Park (Birmingham)

The article was deleted. You could talk to User:Bucketsofg about the deletion, or take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review, if you're so inclined. -- Scientizzle 00:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Pigeon Park. The article was nominated for deletion on the grounds that it was insufficiently notable for inclusion. I agreed with that assessment and also judged that its actually presentation was unencyclopedic. If you disagree, you can take your case to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review. Bucketsofg 13:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pidgeonpark.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pidgeonpark.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Jamesmilner09.jpg

File:Jamesmilner09.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Jamesmilner09.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Jamesmilner09.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:59, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carson Yeung

Hello. The footybio infobox doesn't really apply to Yeung, so I've formatted your image just on its own. You might want to add a short caption to say when/where it was taken, just add your wording after a "|" character like [[Image:carsonyeung.png|thumb|upright|180px|caption text goes here]]. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jennyandnick.png

Thanks for uploading File:Jennyandnick.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. fetchcomms☛ 15:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Nickcleggcutv.png

Thanks for uploading File:Nickcleggcutv.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. fetchcomms☛ 15:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enric Valles

Hello. Was wondering where you got the stuff about the Spanish Youth Cup from? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 14:25, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Best to include just the basic URL of the Valles Exclusive video in your ref, not the bit with your user id and stuff. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Redmond

Hello. Just to let you know that a fact from your article Nathan Redmond will be used in the Did You Know section on the Main Page of Wikipedia sometime tomorrow. It's in Queue 5 on the queue page at the moment, which is scheduled to go on the Main Page at 1 pm on Sunday. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nathan Redmond

On 5 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nathan Redmond, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Enric Vallès, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Please accept this shiny thing in appreciation of your brilliant set of pictures from Birmingham City's open training day... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Moonschool (talk) 15:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wadeelliottvsantwerp.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Wadeelliottvsantwerp.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will Packwood

Hello. Did you happen to take any pictures of Mr Packwood the other day? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:32, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent :-) Struway2 (talk) 12:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Randolph

Hello. I checked the club site before undoing your edit to the BCFC squad section, and as there was nothing about Randolph there at the time I checked (they must have updated very shortly afterwards), I thought the transfer was still media talk. Should have known better, as you're not the sort of editor to go on speculation. Sorry, Struway2 (talk) 17:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Struway2! Will bcfc (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting to see there's three of us active on various BCFC articles. I was the one who made Fahey's article a GA, and I've got Doyle's sat at the GA nom screen, waiting for a review. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Adeyemi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Clark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Squad ordering

Hello. There are 2 main reasons I've usually left them with the previous season's squad numbers. One is that's what the club site tends to do, so the numbers are sourced, so long as we include a note saying they're last year's. The second, and IMO stronger, reason is that unless there's a massive turnover of players, most of them tend not to change, so it just makes more work to change them to a new order and then change them back to something that quite closely resembles what they were changed from in the first place. Not worth reverting, though.

Incidentally, did you ever take any photos of Pablo Ibáñez? The only one in his article is from 2007 in Atlético Madrid kit, which is good, but something more recent in addition to that one would be better. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think there has been a large turnover of players, when all is said and done; I personally don't mind either way of doing things. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 12:51, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks for the explanation Struway! I do agree with Luke, there has been a large turnover of players, with over a third of the new squad list without assigned numbers and only 3 players taking up single digit shirt numbers! So that's why it made sense to do it. The numbers - I anticipate - will be vastly different for the coming season. With regard to Pablo Ibáñez, I don't have any decent pictures of him unfortunately. He wasn't signed in time for the 2011-12 pre-season and I recall he wasn't involved in the pre-season friendly last year, unfortunately. I do plan to take my DSLR to some pre-season games in the next month, so hopefully updated images of all players in the squad by the start of the Championship season! Will bcfc (talk) 13:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pity about Pablo, although I thought you probably hadn't or you'd have added it by now. Won't bother uploading my pretty average pics of Arthur and Higgins yet then. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Just to let you know I mentioned your name at WT:FOOTY#Squad numbers, where the question of removing squad numbers or not had been raised by another editor. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding references

When you add references, can you please ensure you don't just leave the bare link, but actually fill in the valid parameters of a {{cite web}} template? It's particularly problematic when you don't fill in the parameters with a GA, like Colin Doyle. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Will bcfc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Will bcfc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Will bcfc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tate Campbell

Hello. I was leaving him out on loan in case there might be an extension to cover the playoffs, but they don't play till Sunday and we can always put him back "until end of season" if necessary. Or not bother putting him back if they lose... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]