User talk:Wikisharktank

This is Wikisharktank's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bolsonarism (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well-sourced, should be good to accept. A little concerned about introducing this article in-between Presidential election rounds. Wikipedia should not be seen to favor one candidate over another. Plus, the tone comes off a bit NPOV (which was a previous concern in the last deletion discussion)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bolsonarism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bolsonarism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 15:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikisharktank! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 15:49, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Nemer

I'm leaning toward accepting your draft David Nemer article. As the user who nominated the prior article on this subject for deletion four years ago, I was asked to review the new article. I would say that either the article is better sourced, or Nemer has better established himself as an expert in his field in the past four years. In either case, the article now seems appropriate, but I have removed the extensive external links section. This appeared to have been added in an attempt to bolster Nemer's notability, but instead it serves simply to publicize his writings, which is not Wikipedia's purpose. Before I accept the draft, I'd like to give you a chance to review the edits and decide if any of the external links is vital to the understanding of the subject. I'd urge you to review WP:EL to understand the proper use of external links. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61:

@WikiDan61: Hi WikiDan6, thank you for your note and for taking a look at my draft. Yes, I absolutely understand. As I mentioned on RandyKitty's page, I've only added those external links to show Nemer's notability for the review process. The plan was to remove them after the draft was accepted/declined. --Wikisharktank (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed Nemer's draft and it is good to go. Thank you once again! --Wikisharktank (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Nemer has been accepted

David Nemer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bolsonarism

Hello, Wikisharktank. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bolsonarism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. SITH (talk) 12:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Nemer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Nemer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Nemer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (help!) 09:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 05:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]