User talk:Wikiravidas

Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiravidas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 06:54, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramesh Chander (diplomat) (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramesh Chander (diplomat) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Romalo Ram (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases do not qualify as intellectually independent sources. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Romalo Ram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shri Guru Ravidas Vishram Dham Mandir moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shri Guru Ravidas Vishram Dham Mandir. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and We do not create location/building stubs just because they have notable visitors. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I had Provided references for every written paragraph. Please go through all references before reverting the page information. The current published page has many mistakes, which you can easily find only if you are aware of the caste chamar and its different sects throughout the world. I am reverting some of the information that has proper references and will delete some parts that need to be improved in the future.

Please go through the references if you feel anything wrong in page but please don't just revert the whole work.

Regards Wikiravidas (talk) 06:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 14:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat

Hello, Wikiravidas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhai Jai Singh Khalkat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jatav

Please stop introducing BLP entries on Jatav and other caste articles. I checked both of the sources you cited and neither of them had self identification which is a requirement per WP:CASTEID. Adding such entries without self identification is considered as BLP violation, you can cite any instance where the subject has identified as member of said caste e.g interview, social media post or in news coverage. Thanks. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jatav, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please go through the reference that I provided for the demographis. As the table is quite long and time-consuming, I am going through the government data and writing it in steps. It may take time for whole data. So please, instead of deleting it, help me to improve it. Waiting for your reply. You can check the data district wise on - https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/42890 Wikiravidas (talk) 07:49, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiravidas, where is the population data from? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please click the download button on the link. It will take you to government excel sheet. SC-09-PCA-A10-APPENDIX.xlsx Wikiravidas (talk) 08:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Some Jatavs also became Buddhists in 1956" - Source? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 06:07, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This comment was not by me but i found one reference that i will add for this claim. Wikiravidas (talk) 06:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page 95 - see the link - https://www.google.com.au/books/edition/Bhakti_Religion_in_North_India/rpSxJg_ehnIC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=jatav&pg=PA95&printsec=frontcover Wikiravidas (talk) 06:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User:Sitush/CasteSources. Only use peer reviewed journals as sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jatav, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaushambi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]