User talk:Wikinewseditor

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kolkata Derby has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kolkata Derby was changed by Wikinewseditor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955707 on 2016-01-28T14:51:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kolkata Derby with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 14:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinewseditor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wikinewseditor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

21:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kolkata Derby with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kolkata Derby. Dl2000 (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Kolkata Derby

Your recent editing history at Kolkata Derby shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dl2000 (talk) 02:31, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Rrburke (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mohun Bagan A.C., but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Kolkata Derby. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Rrburke (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Kolkata Derby with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 19:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mohun Bagan A.C.. Jim1138 (talk) 19:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

As should be clear to you by now, judging by the above warnings on your talk page, and the number of times you've been reverted, you should source your material...per the WP:Verifiability policy. Read that policy. So, yes, you will continue to get reverted at the Kolkata Derby article if you are adding unsourced content there. Similar goes for edits you make elsewhere on Wikipedia. If you continue to engage in WP:Disruptive behavior, you should expect a WP:Block. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

I reported you at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wikinewseditor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]