User talk:Wikididact

Thomas Hunt Morgan

Thanks for your recent improvement in this section. I'm hoping that eventually some editors will be found who would be interested in making this one into a Featured Article, but it still has a ways to go. Regarding your new section, it could be improved if you could find third parties to comment on the significance of Morgan's work on evolution, instead of just relying on quotes from Morgan himself. By crediting him with 'a modern neo-Darwinian point of view' you might be going a bit over the top. EdJohnston (talk) 16:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your helpful comments. I have made my description of Morgan's contribution to neoDarwinism more specific and added references. More may follow. Wikididact (talk) 14:22, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Olympus LS-10

The article Olympus LS-10 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of importance or significance; WP:CSD#A7 does not apply to articles about software

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bk314159 (talk) 14:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NL wiki

Hoi Wikididact! Kom je nog even naar de Nederlandstalige Wikipedia? Het probleem daar is, vrees ik, nog niet opgelost. Met vriendelijke groet, Kwiki (talk) 01:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Janzen-Connell hypothesis

Thanks for creating this article, I'd been meaning to for ages. SmartSE (talk) 11:28, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]