User talk:Wikiauthor19

July 2019

Hello Wikiauthor19. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wikiauthor19. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wikiauthor19|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 20:59, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--

I am indeed NOT making edits on this Wikipedia page on someone else's behalf. Especially not for compensation. I am providing general knowledge. I have watched Julien's time on Rich Kids of Beverly Hills, The Real Housewives of Atlanta, and Growing Up Hip Hop Atlanta. I have followed him on Instagram for quite a few months now. This is definitely not fair to flag due to an assumption.

Wikiauthor19 (talk) 21:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiauthor19 Perhaps you can explain then how it is that you came to be the photographer for this professional image yet have no conflict of interest? Praxidicae (talk) 21:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Julien George, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have not created ANY pages of myself... My name is Justin Smith, I do not know and am not related to Julien George. I am a general person who knows the facts of the entity. Why am I being blocked from editing a page and why is the page I just worked hard to create being flagged for speedy deletion? I am not Julien and I am not being paid to write this page. So, with that said, why does it have to be removed? Wikiauthor19 (talk) 21:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiauthor19 You also claimed to have created the page however it was created by Juliengeorge2011. Please also explain that and how you came to be the photographer of the professional image I linked above, thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Julien George moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Julien George, does not have enough reliable sources and citations as written to remain published. The references are mere notices, or sites like IMdB that cannot be used as WP references. In particular, they do not refernece that he actually won the award. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please do not review it yourself--it defeats the purpose of Draft space. DGG ( talk ) 16:03, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Julien George concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Julien George, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julien George

Hello, Wikiauthor19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julien George".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:39, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]