User talk:Wikiarya120

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiarya120, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of people from Uttar Pradesh did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 02:42, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Clash Night Tv Member

A tag has been placed on Category:Clash Night Tv Member requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Gorakhpur. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:45, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was just trying to add an information now i will add the information without any external youtube link.

Sorry if I did broke Wikipedia's Guidlines Wikiarya120 (talk) 04:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Wikiarya120 (talk · contribs) has been paid by Fame Manager on behalf of Pradeep Solanki.

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{employer}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia.

You don't get to repeatedly violate the terms of use and say "oopsie, here's my disclosure" and expect things to go better. Disclosing is only one part of that - Wikipedia isn't a venue for you to advertise and post unencyclopedic content. Praxidicae (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry admin Praxidicae .

Can you Guide me for the further processes that what must i do? Have i missed something in the guidelines

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiarya120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Respected admins i am still not aware of my block. Who is aryanshukla. I want to state that i am not any sockpoppet of anyone. This is my one and only account. So, I kindly request you to place a proper unblock. Thankyou Wikiarya120 (talk) 01:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiarya120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey Admin, I have been banned on any unknown reason but as you said as the sockpoppet of any aryanshukla. I have been a college student and joined wikipedia for earning something (mentioned already on my page and talkpage) and i was learning from tags and guides and i got my first work which was deleted Pradeep Solanki by the reason that it was created by any banned user. But i created the again by my self and it was fresh also so why is it being deleted?. And also why i have been banned even it's my first account. I also want to tell you that i live in a hostel with a public wifi so i use it. So, i request you to unban me as there is much misunderstanding. I hope there is no other issues if yes then do note it Wikiarya120 (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, thanks. We really aren't interested in paid editing here. Yamla (talk) 00:12, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.