User talk:Wikiaccount2015

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massimo Livi Bacci (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by George.Edward.C was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wikiaccount2015/Massimo Livi Bacci and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 13:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wikiaccount2015, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 13:44, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Demographics of the United States may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of Economics and Social Affair, Population Division, file with demographic indicators, line #28862)</ref>.
#a02c2c|≤9.5%}}{{col-break}}{{legend|#782121|≤10.5%}}{{legend|#501616|≤11.5%}}{{legend|#280b0b|>11.5%}}{{col-end}}]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Demographics of Mexico. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 13:38, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Demographics of Germany. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tmol42 (talk) 13:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Demographics of Indonesia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Tmol42 (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Massimo Livi Bacci has been accepted

Massimo Livi Bacci, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Massimo Livi Bacci

The article Massimo Livi Bacci has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable academic, does not meet WP:NPROF; h-index is 13 according to Scopus.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]