User talk:Wiki king2

Speedy deletion of Image:Kripaluji maharaj 13.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Kripaluji maharaj 13.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Kripaluji maharaj 13.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 23:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Kripaluji maharaj 12.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Kripaluji maharaj 12.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Kripaluji maharaj 12.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 23:09, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Kripaluji Maharaj 9.png

A tag has been placed on Image:Kripaluji Maharaj 9.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Kripaluji Maharaj 9.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 23:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop uploading copyrighted images under false free licenses. Polly (Parrot) 23:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wiki king2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Polly (Parrot) 23:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

_GB^T/C 20:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki king2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I already explained that I am not Sven99. I have not uploaded copyright material. The reason given for banning me is that we both upload the same material, i already said that the images were taken by us. Sven was banned for uploading his own work. So I uploaded the same. At the time i didnt understand the wikipedia copyright policy so i may not have followed the correct procedure for uploading, but its not a reason for stopping me from editing.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, images are taken by one person. That both of you claim to have taken the exact same image indicates either you are the same person or one or both of you is not being truthful about having taken the photograph. That the images appear to come from here, and as that site is marked as being copyrighted and not licensed under the terms you claim, indicates that you are indeed violating copyright. Note, though, that it is entirely possible that you are involved with running that site, in which case you can place a notice on the site indicating that the images are licensed under these terms. In that case, you would have to refrain from editing articles about Maharaji Kripalu, etc., as per WP:COI. But in any case, you admit to uploading images on behalf of Sven, a blocked user, and thus are indeed an abusive sockpuppet account, see WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK. As such, I am denying your unblock request. — Yamla (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.