User talk:Wiki conitributor

June 2024

Hello, I'm Ae245. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Road (2009 film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ae245 (talk) 03:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pinga (disambiguation). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. If you have also been editing as a logged-out editor, for example, ~~73.204.19.138~~172.59.210.4, please note your conduct may constitute WP:3RR. Oblivy (talk) 01:48, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes i was. it was an accident, and not meant as sock-puppetry. Wiki conitributor (talk) 00:44, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon, you may be blocked from editing. The person who loves reading (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Sexual capital. CodeTalker (talk) 21:12, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki conitributor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my edits are bad. I will start editing only the pages I'm contributive and a very sorry for what i did. Also i did not sockpueet, one of the IPs was an accidiental log-out and the other wasn't me.Wiki conitributor (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wiki conitributor (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]