User talk:WikiReviewer111

April 2023

Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ashutosh (spiritual leader) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DreamRimmer (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ashutosh (spiritual leader). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DreamRimmer (talk) 06:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to the actions committed on the page. The choice of words and information provided is offensive and defamatory to the great work done for the society by His Holiness. Please refer to details here: djjs.org WikiReviewer111 (talk) 06:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles should be nutural. TenWhile6 (talk) 07:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, articles should be indeed be neutral and free of any mal-intent. Please post facts and avoid spreading mis-information WikiReviewer111 (talk) 07:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's appalling to see that factual data is reverted to a language which is offensive. Please refrain from making such changes WikiReviewer111 (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to point out Wikipedia's guideline on the topic: MOS:HONORIFIC, which states, in part, that honorifics "are not generally used in the running text of the article." This has to do with neutrality, so that we do not unduly give honor to a subject in a non-neutral fashion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add on here in agreement, WikiReviewer111. What you are doing is flat wrong. Wikipedia does not work by means of brute force. Attempting to force your version of the article five times [1][2][3][4][5] in the span of less than an hour? Are you convinced that if you do this another time it's somehow going to stick? Maybe 50 times? 100 times? This is not how we do things on Wikipedia. If you attempt to make this change again without gaining consensus to do so, you will be blocked. Consider this a final warning. Start a discussion on the article's talk page to try to gain consensus. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war at Ashutosh (spiritual leader)

Your recent editing history at Ashutosh (spiritual leader) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 16:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, WikiReviewer111. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ashutosh (spiritual leader), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sumanuil, thank you for your response. The statements stated on the page are false and even neglect the final decision given by the honourable High Court in India. For example, the article mentions that Ashutosh Maharaj Ji had a child which was dismissed by the court. I don't want a Senior Editor like yourself to be a party to this misinformation campaign. Please help me in bringing about the well-researched and legally proven truth about His Holiness Shri Ashutosh Maharaj Ji. WikiReviewer111 (talk) 06:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Ashutosh (spiritual leader)) for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]