User talk:Wikedpluri

Don't stalk me bro.

You create your account and your first and second edits (within 8 mins) are reverting me, on totally unrelated articles? Don't stalk me. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikedpluri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. I have no idea who the ID's owner is. I contributed what I know.

Decline reason:

A checkuser has connected the IP of this account to Clearfile86 (talk · contribs), which is also connected through behavior. Until you are more transparent about the relationship between these two accounts, I don't see this request as being valid. Kuru (talk) 13:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let's see. I deleted wrong information added by One person. And then other people deleted same thing. The one who added wrong information with non-reliable article insisted all people who erased the garbage are only one person.. (The url he or she added is not the official news written by official reporter. It's self published.. But the url doesn't say this truth, though.) What else I can explain? I am not the other people. Oh.. it's the way of making noise and adding false information. {{unblock|When do I connected same IP to Clearfile86? I have no idea about Clearfile86.. so I'm wondering}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikedpluri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've logged in Wikipedia four times since I made the account. I've logged in my home and cafe. The administrator told the IP was same with Clearfile86.. Hmm I am wondering how it was possible.. When my ID was same? 8th of October, 9th of October, 24th of October, 26th of October?

Decline reason:

In addition to a technical match, there is a topical one. In other words, you're editing same articles. In this situation, it would require a serious evidence to unblock. Max Semenik (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser checks more than just the IP (which, mind you, can be spoofed). Just because you're logged in to your account doesn't mean your IP magically stops changing; odds are the cafe IP is the one that was used by Clearfile. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you made the same edits, on the same articles as clearfile. You stalked the same user (me) and had a technical match. It's pretty obvious it's the same person. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]