Jump to content

User talk:Wifione/Archive 2010 (September)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability of musical artists

[edit]

I'd say it was stretching it a little to claim 'releasing' two songs a week on Youtube over a two month span was an assertion of notability. Catfish Jim and the soapdish (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point; but perhaps the author did not mention that the two releases per week were on YouTube... And the claim was not just a claim of releasing two songs per week, but that the same placed him as "one of the most consistent artist in the city". Irrespective of that, I'm on your side with respect to understanding the page does not belong to Wikipedia, unless the author proves notability. Warm regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 10:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confused by your CSD notice

[edit]

I was creating a userbox and I thought I was following the correct steps creating one, until I discovered that it was in the wrong format (or so I thought); so I tried to move it to a "User" prefix page. I still don't understand why it was deleted. PLEASE, would you kindly steer me in the right direction so I don't make any more mistakes; apparently I'm missing something from the WikiProject Userboxes page.-- Avazina, an Unreconstructed Southerner 12:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion Request/Help with a coding/ I believe I made an error!

[edit]

Please explain the reason for the Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion added for the page. WFCR_purchase. The page was created as a discussion in the request for the merging of the article WGAJ. Unless there is another way for discussion that I missed (which I might have, this was the first time i've done an article merge). Please help so that the discussion of the WGAJ merge can be done. ( I probably coded something incorrect in the merging tag, to be honest.) NECRATSpeak to me 08:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard. I found my error. I mis-coded the merge tag. Sorry for any inconvience, was an honest mistake! Thanks for your help. NECRATSpeak to me 08:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Wifione. You have new messages at Beeblebrox's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Why did you delete the French National Underwear Day? It's a real thing that people here do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RenoHuskerDu (talk • contribs) 18:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

[edit]
[edit]

The script documentation is at User:Anomie/linkclassifier. Colours can be changed to your own preferences. Works for Vector skin and Monobook. Kimchi.sg (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your RFA

[edit]

It's going well *knocks on wood* but I fear if you keep responding to votes, sooner or later someone will wheel out the old badgering ploy as a "reason" to oppose you. I know you're not badgering at all but some wrongly consider any response to votes to be inappropriate. Just thought I'd let you know. Aiken (talk) 12:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • All right. I'll keep that in mind. I felt that it would be rude to simply ignore people who have taken their time out, analysed contributions and left a comment. Of course, the people who're in the support section deserve my response. But it was just that I felt that people in the oppose and neutral section deserved a response, a note, anything just to give them an idea that I appreciate their comments and have taken it to my task list. Still, thanks for the note and best regards. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 12:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael McDonald (fighter)

[edit]

The article appears to already have been deleted. I was contesting the face that it was deleted. I do not know how to have it opened for discussion to reinstate. The newer version meets the established criteria.(Ppt1973 (talk) 12:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Sorry, but I do not see your response.(Ppt1973 (talk) 12:59, 10 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for the response. Where is the deleted article? I would like the work on that version, as I spent an hour creating it.(Ppt1973 (talk) 13:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

relisting votes

[edit]

In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toyota acronyms you relisted all the votes to the bottom - except mine.  Stepho  (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Stepho, thanks for your message. Like many others, I use a script for relisting. It could be a mistake during the relisting that the vote got deleted. Let me go through the AfD and re-do it. Thanks for the message and sorry for the inconvenience. ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ ―Œ ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣ 02:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, it was my misunderstanding. With the line across the page combined with a few new votes immediately afterwards, I misunderstood 'relist' for 're-sort' (I'm a computer programmer and my recent tasks have been to do with sorting lists in foreign languages). My apologies.  Stepho  (talk) 23:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks spam

[edit]
Hello Wifione, thank you for supporting my RfA!
I was promoted with a final tally of 65/4/3.
I hope I can live up to everyone's expectations, do my best for Wikipedia, and take to heart the constructive criticism. Always feel free to message me if I'm around.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

replay re: Jason Steed comment

[edit]

Hi! I have no memory of Jason Steed. Could you point me to where the comment was so I can see why my sig appeared? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Derekbd (talk • contribs) 19:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ha ha hmm, errant IP addresses, or something

[edit]

It's all clear as mud. :-) I am now in ignore mode re: J.Steed. When I have had a look round your page I might make another comment. Thanks for the regards. All the best to you ... Derekbd (talk) 10:57, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

[edit]
Hello, Wifione. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Airplaneman ✈ 13:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

[edit]

Sig

[edit]

Since you asked for feedback, I'd say review Wikipedia:Sig#Appearance and color with an eye on interpreting the guidelines there conservatively. Removing or reducing the non-latin, decorative unicode would be a good place to start as well. Gigs (talk) 13:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I appreciate your feedback a ton. I've worked out three options below. I've deleted the Unicode characters, at the same time I've also done away with the shadow effect in all the signatures. Additionally, I've changed colours (as the colour red might hit the eye garishly). Do give me your feedback on which one would you think might be acceptable and easy to the eye. Sincerely:
Any of the three would be fine I think. Thanks. Gigs (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Then I'll choose the first one; as the red colour would be retained from the original. Thanks for the reply again. Sincerely... Wifione ....... Leave a message 15:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

[edit]
They lied when they said it wasn't a trophy...here it is!

I have closed your RFA as successful. You may or may not want to take a look at the New Admin School. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Useight (talk) 18:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Like I mentioned, it's a privilege to be accepted by you all. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:02, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Given my word to Gigs. So won't change it :) Not till I stand for bureaucrat. Then I'll kick out the colour too :):):) Thanks again and kind regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Joe :) Wifione ....... Leave a message
  • Congratulations, and thanks for changing your sig! But, I am not getting any link to your user talk when I hover over the right-hand part of your signature. This could be a technical blooper, not a flaw in the design. EdJohnston (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You were joking Ed, right? :):) Thanks again Wifione ....... Leave a message
Yes, I see that your talk page link works when you sign on other pages. Sorry. EdJohnston (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks HJ, it's a pleasure to have had your vote in my support section. Thanks for that. Wifione ....... Leave a message 20:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You'll be the first I'll always ask Steve. Thanks :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 20:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was just about to reach your user page :):) Alzarian, thanks for the message; it's really appreciated. Wifione ....... Leave a message 20:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll second what Useight said above about New Admin School, I was checking that page and related pages multiple times a day for at least a week after I got the mop. Have fun! -- Atama頭 20:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, surely. Thanks for the vote again; and the message here :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 20:32, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
NSD, :) Thanks for the note. I'll mop well. Best Wifione ....... Leave a message 04:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not belated, well in time. Thanks so much Tyro15. Wishes. Wifione ....... Leave a message 04:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that Ron. Very sweet :) Will keep it. Wifione ....... Leave a message 04:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Efcmagnew, thanks for the note. Sure, will welcome all queries from you. Take care and cheers. Wifione ....... Leave a message 04:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! Connormah (talk) 13:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) My regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:57, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My congratulations to you on the successful pursuit of mop-hood. For the record, I thought your original signature was fine. Wait one year ... then revert it back! --Quartermaster (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Quartermaster :) I think the only thing I miss from my original signature are the musical notes. I kind of really loved them. But it's all right. I'll do an RfC before putting them on, given the opposition my signature garnered in the RfA. Thanks again for the lovely message. Appreciated. Wifione ....... Leave a message 06:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Totally missed your message. Thanks Hokeman :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 15:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grats

[edit]

Grats on your getting your mop!

This admin has been awarded the Order of the Mop
This user is an administrator on the English Wikipedia. (verify)



Congrats Wifione :)

Wifione has been made a member of the Order of the Mop,
for their work as an admin and is entitled to display
this award for being such a great admin,

Kind regards and happy editing,
Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм | Champagne? 08:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For a userbox version go here.

Formally awarding you this, well award. :) Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм | Champagne? 08:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oh no I'm confident you deserve the award, with your work as a standard user why wouldn't I be? The award is just a way of saying thank you, there's no bi-yearly meeting of members, no Commander of the Order. It functions as an award, I mean I would love for it to be something that becomes a big thing on Wikipedia but I doubt that would ever happen. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 06:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename the page

[edit]

Hello, please rename Yerevan State Institute of Economy to Armenian State University of Economics ([1]) 6AND5 (talk) 20:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A little late... but oh well

[edit]

Congratulations, Wifione! I was very glad to support you and I'm sure you will make a wonderful admin. :) Your RFA thankspam was the first of its kind I've received that contain a personal message instead of the usual standard one. Bejinhan talks 10:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from me as well. There are some nifty scripts in my monobook that you might want to try out - drop down menus for block messages for example. ϢereSpielChequers 12:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks WereSpielChequers. I actually look up to a lot of work that you and a few others do around. Thanks for this note. I'll cehck out the scripts and take your help. Sincere regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, could you check the blurb I wrote on you at The Signpost? I don't have the correct link for the Wikimedia taskforce, either. Tony (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS My eyes are getting old. This grey colour is not all that easy to read. Tony (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tony, I've just added the external link on the signpost. Do format it the way you might wish to. And the grey colour, let me see how I can change it fast. My best Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for the blurb too. It's so well written. Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats from me too! If you've any queries, feel free to ask, and like WSC, I've got a few scripts in my monobook.js, as has SoWhy. Good luck and enjoy! GedUK  14:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You guys have really made my day today :):) I'll surely drop into your page and check the monobook out. Thanks for the lovely note here. Sincerely. Wifione ....... Leave a message 14:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ahhh, my eyes are happy! Tony (talk) 14:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I look forward to working with you as a sysop. :) Tommy! 14:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you have time to work on the gigantic backlog of requested edit filters (an area which makes me uncomfortable, since I'm running out of ways to softly say "no"). —Soap— 17:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It'll surely take time. But yes, I'll take the time out and try the best I can. Thanks :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats. I wasn't able to find the time to do the due diligence needed to !vote, but I've seen your helpfulness at the Help desk so I was pulling for you (and would have made time, had it been a closer call.)--SPhilbrickT 18:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm honored. Really. I am. Thanks Philbrik. Wifione ....... Leave a message 06:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, personalized RfA thankspam, thanks a bunch! In hindsight, I wish I had written a stronger support !vote, but oh well– you passed anyways. I look forward to seeing you as an outstanding administrator, well done Wifione! Nomader (Talk) 16:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What you wrote, was anyway considerable. Thanks again Nomader. Kind regards :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hipster Pornography

[edit]

OK, what is it, and are there any reliable sources? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Everard. Thanks for the message. You had tagged this as being a hoax. If you check the net for this term, it exists. So I suspect this might not have qualified at all on {{db-hoax}}. You could (and you should) prod it immediately. I anyway would do that in some time if the author doesn't add sources by today. Sincerely. Wifione ....... Leave a message 06:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I looked it up and kept finding mentions, but nothing that said what it is. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then you should perhaps never db-hoax it. Seriously. Prod articles that can't be tagged under any db criteria; and then take them to AfD if they still aren't notable. Do take my help for anything. Regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 06:45, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do some more research tomorrow, but I don't find anything close to RSs, let alone explaining what it means, so I'll probably be afding it tomorrow. Do you want me to send you an AfD notice if and when I do? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no, don't worry about that. I have it on my manual watch list so will keep checking. I've prodded the article right now for you. If you wish, you can +1 it. Let's give the author one final chance to prove notability :) Take care and best Everard. Wifione ....... Leave a message 06:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Wifione. You have new messages at Diego Grez's talk page.
Message added 18:59, 17 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

RE: Did you?

[edit]

Hehe, of course. That was because you are a user that really deserves the sysop rights. :D DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 19:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We'll see about that as time passes :):) Thanks Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Thanks Dwayne!

[edit]

Your welcome and congratulations! - Dwayne {{small|was here!)) ♫ 21:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Wifione. You have new messages at Nolelover's talk page.
Message added 23:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nolelover 23:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

[edit]

Hi Wifione! Don't forget that there's not only the US east and west coast time zones, there's the whole of Europe and the rest of the world out there! - with plenty of Wikipedians :). Best, --Kudpung (talk) 03:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sir, surely. Sorry for the missout. Sincere regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 10:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AFD closures

[edit]

I'm going to sound very hypocritical saying this, as I have done exactly this in times past. You seem to be closing a number of AFDs before the 7 day time limit is up (1, 2). Could you try to avoid doing this in the future please? Thanks, NW (Talk) 17:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There! I make so many mistakes to get your attention and phew, finally you decide to take notice :):) Ok; jokes apart, my apologies. I think I'm messing up the AfDs. If you could guide me on this, it'll be wonderful. I only close those AfDs that are listed on the "Articles (in closing)" log pages for closing (something like this). I have noticed almost all other some other administrators and bureaucrats following a similar pattern of closing only those AfDs that are listed on this log page. For example, Cirt closed this and this today, even though the technical equivalent of 7 full days x 24 hours had not yet expired. I have therefore been led to believe that this is the appropriate method of looking at AfDs to close. Do kindly guide me on whether this is appropriate or not? I'll wait for your reply before moving on in the AfD bit. Thanks and regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 14:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) There's a related (general) discussion on AfD closures at WP:AN. Interestingly, Cirt owns up to closing AfDs early ;-) I think this (closing AfDs) is a fairly common occurrence, and one that the community probably hasn't paid too much attention to until recently. The good news is that there seems to be an effort underway to refine the AfD template, so that it clearly indicates whether the AfD is ready for closure. TFOWR 14:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank god; there's a whole bunch that seems to be making my mistake. Yahoo!!! Everybody loses adminship together.:):) Wifione ....... Leave a message 14:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • FWIW, if it is the 7th day of the AfD (but not actually 7x24 hours since it opened), I'd generally only close it if it's pretty unanimously "delete" or "keep" - if it's more mixed, then I'll normally leave it until the 7x24 hours are up! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's pretty sensible... Unfortunately, I'm confused on this still; I'll follow the discussions on the link that TFOWR's given. Wifione ....... Leave a message 15:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the comment, by Phantomsteve (talk · contribs), above. -- Cirt (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Cirt for the note... Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

[edit]

Jawad

[edit]

Hi, as it has been immediately recreated at least once and has been the victim of a sockfarm, perhaps salting is a good idea? Off2riorob (talk) 15:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Off2riorob :) First of all, it's good to see you here (btw, never got a chance to thank you for your work on that Senator's article which came up from the BLP noticeboard). Ok, with respect to this blp, presumably it's not an attack blp. It was A7'd (and deleted); recreated and later given the same treatment at AfD. If you think it's all right, let's wait. If it's recreated, I'll keep a watch and salt it then. What say? Wifione ....... Leave a message 15:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFA-Sig

[edit]

Your welcome. BTW, your sig has 7 little dots under the "leave a message."?.--intelati(Call) 16:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just making sure that was intentional. :) BTW, I used Chrome and Win 7, and could see the notes perfectly fine.--intelati(Call) 16:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the support :) But it's all right, I mean my signature change. I kind of have started liking it well now :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

[edit]

all the best

[edit]

Hi - thanks mate. All the best to you - ull be a great admin! Shiva (Visnu) 00:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again :) Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the French Underwear Day post?

[edit]

It is a real thing that we do here. (RenoHuskerDu (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Reno, I'm sure it must be a real and interesting thing you do out there. Could you kindly read Wikipedia's policy on why and how every proposed article on Wikipedia should qualify on what we call notability? In other words, articles need to have verifiable information, using reliable sources that prove that there is merit for the topic to be included in our encyclopedia? If you have access to verifiable and reliable sources that prove the notability of this article, do guide me to the same and I'll help you get the article back on track. How does that sound? I've left a copy of this message on your talk page. Feel free to reply to me there or here. Kind regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously?

[edit]

The primary was a week ago now. You're acting like it didn't exist. Want a source? Here's one. And another. Yet still another. I wouldn't think this was controversial, but leaving this open like he's still in the race after the fact is ridiculous. I would've thought this was common knowledge. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 22:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Wifione. You have new messages at Ronk01's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ronk01 talk 15:31, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Easy

[edit]

I'm discussing with ArbCom about me getting resyropped, but with heavy restrictions. I can't handle RFA, that's my weak spot, look at my prior history with them. There was a personal attack in there that really hit my nerve, if I can't get the tools back from ArbCom then I don't know what to do. I bought so many book sources to work on articles but I just don't want to go though RFA ever again. Thanks Secret account 18:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, good to hear from you. Look, RfA should not be considered a trial-by-fire and adminship should never be the objective of your being on Wikipedia. You have to enjoy the experience of editing on Wikipedia rather than having a focus of regaining adminship and then getting demotivated by RfA voting. The perspective is that RfA is a great place to get an idea of what other editors perceive of your contributions - and not of your character. None of the editors who opposed were blind to your contributions; almost everybody spoke in appreciation. And if I may comment, if editors like Fetchcomms, Soap have to vote for you, you have an incredible backing on this project. Finally, my advice would be to not pursue the adminship bit right now. Believe me, you have the background and the commitment to get adminship back in a few months. Right now, try and enjoy each day on Wikipedia:):) It surely is a great place to be and to interact with editors who respect you a considerable lot. And get back to doing much of what you were doing earlier - building articles. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

[edit]

Thanks for the note. Glad it worked out for you. :-) MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not without your presence :) See you around. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Thanks

[edit]

Hey thanks for the response the reliable source was my brother he was tell me what to write so it will be accurate and correct. Hopefully we can get this done in the correct manner. Thanks. Marissa Dure —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marsbar523 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • There you go :) Do kindly read one of the helpful notes we have on how to identify reliable sources for articles that are on Wikipedia. Surprisingly, information given by brothers doesn't quite figure on that list :) I guess one of the reasons why we should never believe our brothers :):) Jokes apart, the fact is that if you wish any article to be there on Wikipedia, it has to qualify on our notability guidelines, in other words, the minimum criteria to be met for a topic to be worth an article on Wikipedia. Do read these notability guidelines well (just click on the links I'm providing within the statements). Finally, this'll be a good time for you and your brother to read information on what Wikipedia is not. This'll help you reduce the possibility of your future articles getting deleted. Again, apologies for having deleted your article. Feel free to take my help any time in the future for anything to do with Wikipedia. Best regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 03:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reformat of your message on another's talk page

[edit]

Hi Wifione, I'm hoping that you wont mind if I "reformat" your message on Bad edits r dumb's talk page. I'd just like to give the message it's own section header so your generous offer doesnt get lost. If you've got no problems with that, I'll gladly break it out into a new section entitled "Offer to train you on Help Desk" Best, Robert ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 20:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gerard Dure

[edit]

Gerard Dure is my brother he's the one I'm doing the article about so he would be the reliable source since the article is about him. Hope this clears things up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marsbar523 (talk • contribs) 23:26, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Hi Marsbar23, until Wifione gets a chance to respond, you may wish to read up on reliable sources so you fully understand what Wifione is trying to explain to you. Knowledge of secondary sources is a specific part you should familiarize yourself with (which your brother, sadly does not qualify as). Hope this helps get you started. Best, Robert ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 23:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes Marsbar, it does clear things up (as it did the last time too). You simply cannot create articles based on what your brother says. Do kindly read our notability guidelines first. It's the primary step to understand how to ensure your articles don't get deleted. Once you've read it, write back for clarifications. Cheers. Wifione ....... Leave a message 14:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:adminship

[edit]

Hi - yeah I'd love to help out as an admin, but I was inactive for many months and I've been back for only 1.5 months. My commitment to WP is rock-solid, but I think I'll need to put in a little more time to build the evidence. Thank you for thinking of me :) Shiva (Visnu) 00:53, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I do believe though that you don't need to slog it out too long. You seem to be a good prospect, on the face of it. Wifione ....... Leave a message 14:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Ley

[edit]

Karl Ley I have removed the speedy delete/prod tags as I have worked the article a bit and included sutiable evidence of notability, hope that helps ==Deprodding of Karl Ley== I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Karl Ley, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Sinbadslimpig (talk) 18:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Timneu, don't get too irritated by my removing the CSD tag. Actually you tagged an individual on A7 when the article clearly mentioned the individual was a George Medal recipient. That's a claim of notability. It's grossly incorrect to put an A7 then; and I have to say that I myself have in my pre-admin days undertaken such mistakes of tagging individuals on A7 when the claim of notability was there. Still, don't worry. Open up a deletion discussion. That might help. I've left a copy of this message on your talk page. Take care and write back for any assistance you might require in the future. Wifione ....... Leave a message 18:56, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think he's all right. I wouldn't call him a crusader or anything like that. It'll sound negative. We're all volunteers out here and he's like other volunteer patrollers who take out time from their normal daily life to contribute for the betterment of Wikipedia. Differences of opinion will obviously be there. But what is important is to understand consensus and go by it. He's gone completely as per process; though applied it wrongly. It would feel bad if an administrator (like me) takes out a mistakenly placed speedy deletion tag. Yes, he could use better words; but that's a story for another day. By the way, there's a deletion discussion already in progress on the article; and as much as I can presume, it's going towards a speedy keep. So if you need any help, do write back. Thanks and cheers. Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My deleted Entry for Sosspippen

[edit]

This is not a hoax. My daughter invented this word and I have not seen it anywhere else in the world. Why did you delete the from Wikipedia. She is only 10 years old now and very sad the word she invented has been deleted as a hoax. Regards Christine Harris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.223.114 (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

[edit]

I agree with your decisions and I am very sorry for not reviewing the usage guidelines more carefully. My intentions were to contribute in an un-assuming and respectful fashon. As a new user I became overwhelmed and got a little carried away. Some of the links I created should have been more carefully considered and I realise that the name "InismX" is confusing and inapropriate. I did not intend to promote or represent groups, nor indorse a website or person, so I will change my name and make the general policy of neutrality my first concern with any work that I submit. Thank you for quickly bringing the policies to my attention. Sincerely, Jeremy

WP:FUCK

[edit]

I think an important discussion is finally taking place there. I'd hate for some admin (or more likely, a non-admin closer) to truncate that discussion by closing because you withdrew your MfD nom. Can you please reinstate it so that we can finish discussing? There may be a compromise in the works. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 04:52, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry; with the number of comments coming in, I don't think any admin would wish to close this discussion early. But the consensus seems to be heading one way only, and that is to keep the essay. I, perhaps unfortunately, come from a background where the usage of the word 'fuck' is considered quite uncivil, in whichever context it is used. For example, it would be an impossible event for me to use the above WP:FUCK essay with, say, Mr. Wales. And if I can't use it with him, I wouldn't use it with any other Wikipedia editor. That said, if the community wishes this essay to stay, it stays :) But not in my space :) Thanks Noraft for the note. And by the way, good work on the GOCE. Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Username

[edit]

G'day Wifione, you left a message on my alternate account, AusTerrapinBotEdits, regarding the suitability of the username. Whilst I hadn't paid close attention to WP:USERNAME, I have been trying to establish what permissions I actually do need to get for the account. AWB is not supposed to be used with a high edit-rate frequency on ordinary accounts and that a separate account needs to be set up for this so that edits can be filtered out from recent changes when desired. When I looked up bot account approval processes, the information was geared to automated bots, not editors operating semi-automated bots. So far I have not been able to find any information on where I can get approval for this, if indeed there is a formal process to go through. The username for the alternate account was established to make it clear that it was my alternate account and that it was for editing with bots such as AWB. I thought that '...BotEdits' was sufficient to distinguish it from being a pure bot account. Any advice that will assist would be appreciated. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AusTerrapin. Your bot-named account will be blocked soon (unless you are going to run an approved-bot yourself). I should advise you to set up a new account after reading our username policy so that it doesn't contravene any of our policies. Do ensure that you provide a clear connection between the two accounts to be retained (as information perhaps on the user page of both accounts), something that you correctly did with the bot named account too. Your AWB request should be approved pretty soon post-that once you re-apply with the new name. Feel free to contact me for any clarification. Sincerely. Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That didn't really answer my question directly, however I take it that you don't consider the distinction to be sufficient and that you don't believe that it is appropriate to include bot in the title for semi-automated editing accounts. On this basis, my intent is to go through the rename process (as opposed to establishing a new account). Any objections to using 'AusTerrapinSemiAutomatedEdits'? I am still after any info on who I might need to notify about frequent editing with AWB and, potentially, other tools - if you are unsure, is there someone you can point me in the direction of? Please note that I won't be editing with the account until it is endorsed. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 19:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have no issues with your suggested name above (AusTerrapinSemiAutomatedEdits). Others might have. You could use AusTerrapinAWBedits, if that sounds better to you. But it's your personal choice surely. You could also consider naming your account with a bot name in case you are going to use AWB to make many edits per minute. But you will have to go to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval and request approval before coming to AWB. In fact, my suggestion is, apply for permission there for your currently blocked bot username. Once permission is given, any administrator like me would unblock it and you could be on your way. Also, you don't need to inform anybody for your frequent editing with AWB or with other automated tools like Huggle etc. It's only when your edits exceed a certain limit that you need to be careful (please read the WP:AWB page for relevant details). Having a different name for AWB usage allows you to track your own mass changes, and allows your primary username to be devoid of automated edits (sometimes, this is helpful in RfA analysis, where some editors vote negatively in case you have a high percentage of automated edits). Please contact me for any further help. Wifione ....... Leave a message 05:17, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BRfA has now been submitted at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/AusTerrapinBotEdits. Intent is for frequent edits per minute (5-10, subject to my ability to check changes and network/server speed). Thanks for the advice. AusTerrapin (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

[edit]

Hiya

[edit]
Hello, Wifione. You have new messages at WP:PERM/ACC.
Message added 00:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I replied to your question there. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:42am • 00:42, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

[edit]

Wow,you go through all my edits looking for incivility? You really need something better to do. Those comments were in reaction to seemingly ridiculous PROD policies which are different from AfD and CSD nominations. I was unaware that PROD tags cannot be reapplied; it's ridiculous that they can just be removed be poor-intentioned editors and force AfD. I hate prod, and rarely use it because of all the problems that exist with it. It's a waste of time. Note: I am not watching this page and have nothing more to say. — Timneu22 · talk 11:29, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Wifione. You have new messages at Delta Trine's talk page.
Message added 13:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wifione/Archive_2010_(September)&oldid=1106887233"