User talk:Wiest1989

Incorrect section headers

Hello. I've noticed you've been adding incorrect section headers to some articles, such as Mirai Nagasu. Please notice that these section headers, such as "senior", are incorrect and misleading. The purpose of a competitive highlights table is to show competition results by season. I understand that you are trying to show this by level, but many skaters compete in both the junior and senior levels in the same season. If you are trying to implement a structure similiar to what is used on the Japanese language Wikipedia, please go ahead and add that in addition to what we have already. But please note that in Japanese Wikipedia sections, this includes all the results for that competition. Kolindigo (talk) 20:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for experimenting with the page Rachael Flatt on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 03:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Rachael Flatt. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Katrina Hacker, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kolindigo (talk) 22:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Katrina Hacker. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Kolindigo (talk) 03:08, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Kim Yu-Na. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Closedmouth (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Ina Bauer (element). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 19:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you have been removing links to competitions by year article, such changing the 2007 Trophée Eric Bompard to Trophée Eric Bompard. When linking to specific results or to personal bests, you should link to the most exact article. So if a skater earned a personal best at the 2007 Trophée Eric Bompard, that is the article that should be linked to, not the Trophée Eric Bompard article as a whole. I realize that you are copying these results boxes from other languages that do not have articles for these pages and then translating them into English. Thank you for your additions, but please understand that we do have articles for these competitions. Please do not add back the more general links, because they can cause confusion. There is also no need to pipe them with general titles such as that it is an ISU competition. These pipings may also be adding incorrect information, such as the wrong name for the competition. The link to the article should be enough. Thanks for your contributions. Kolindigo (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ina Bauer (element)

Thank you for adding a source to support your assertion that Kim Yu-Na's performance of the Ina Bauer element is iconic. However, I do not speak Korean. Could you please provide a translation on Talk:Ina Bauer (element) of your source? An online translation program does not support that this source states that this is an iconic portrayal, just that Kim Yu-Na does the element. There is no dispute that Kim performs the element; the dispute is that this performance of the Ina Bauer is iconic. A translation from a Korean speaker of this source would help clear up this issue. Thanks! Kolindigo (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Yu-Na Edits

Please understand I am NOT trying to attack Kim. A triple axel is indeed a triple jump, hence the word triple in its name. If it were a quad jump, its name would obviously be quadruple axel. Anyways, I'm glad you realize that the source states that Kim hasn't cleanly landed the 3A, and you've changed it to 'five triple jumps' instead. I definitely don't have a problem with that because it's accurate. Before, when the Wikipedia article stated "all triple jumps," it implied that also included the triple axel, and implying so would not be the truth.

Regarding your edits to the Ina Bauer article, you're keen on mentioning Kim as the sole skater that uses the Ina Bauer into a jump sequence. Unlike Arakawa, who has gained significant media attention because of her Ina Bauer, Kim has not. If I'm wrong, you can add a reliable source that Kim is known for her Ina Bauer.

Otherwise, why should she deserve a special mention when many other skaters use the exact same sequence of the Ina Bauer into a jump combo? Skaters like Mirai Nagasu, Caroline Zhang, Elene Gedevanishvili, and many other skaters commonly perform the same move. I wouldn't have a problem if it this were mentioned on Kim's own article, but I don't think it belongs in the Ina Bauer article. It's too general to name specific skaters that perform the move, because there is simply too many to name.

Please understand that I'm not attacking Kim. I'm just trying to keep Wikipedia articles unbiased and fair. PLEASE use talk pages before you revert anyone's changes without adding valid reason. I hate when disagreements become one sided. No offense, but you seem to have a history of starting these things.

Byxbee (talk) 23:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can keep blindly reverting edits and adding inaccurate information, but me and other true Wikipedia editors who follow the rules will be there to correct your mistakes, errors, and outright lies. Byxbee (talk) 19:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please use English

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 20:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

>> 깝치고있네..

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

images

Stop forcing image sizes in thumbnails. It is against image rules. And you should read what the image is of, some of your captions have been wrong information that can be avoided if you look at what the image is of or where it came from. 141.151.184.154 (talk) 20:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

>> Where is the image rule?? Please teach me. :D

WP:IMAGE contains relevant image guidelines. Also, please be careful when you define image sizes in infoboxes, because you are defining sizes that are larger than the infoboxes and so they are making the infobox stretch. Kolindigo (talk) 19:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On adding results to articles...

Please wait for a competition to be over before adding those results to articles. :) Kolindigo (talk) 15:20, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Most recent results"

Please stop adding redundant sections of "most recent results" such as you've done to Rachael Flatt. Such articles already have long, in depth sections of results, organized chronologically. There is no need to have a redundant floating box with this information. Please stop adding one. Kolindigo (talk) 16:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Rebeka Kim

A tag has been placed on Rebeka Kim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 04:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Rebeka Kim. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebeka Kim

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rebeka Kim, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

does not indicate significance to pass WP:ATHLETE. This is a non-notable novice level skater.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kolindigo (talk) 16:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

/// I understand.

AfD nomination of Rebeka Kim

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rebeka Kim, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebeka Kim. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kolindigo (talk) 13:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in articles

Please be careful when creating articles, such as Song Nan. If you do not have good sources for results, then please do not add them to articles. It's better to have no results than wrong results. Kolindigo (talk) 14:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ivana Reitmayerová. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 17:47, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Michelle Kwan has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 01:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

War of Wiest1989 and Kolindigo

한국분이신 거 같은데 연아양 위키에서 싸우지 마세요. 그리고 기사를 살리시려면 source를 붙여주세요.

user: Top on ice

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]