User talk:Wi5hakeki

December 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 14:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was considering blocking you from editing International cricket because of ongoing edit warring and a refusal to seek the talk page, but then I saw your block log and your talk page history. Constantly blanking the talk page is one thing, it's your right of course, but it does not suggest you know what collaborative editing is, but NEVER responding to concerns from other editors is quite another. And then it turns out you were blocked indefinitely for edit warring, and were unblocked with a promise, "I assure you that I will never ever edit war again", which you broke immediately. Drmies (talk) 14:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but I didn't edit war a single time. I always provided my reason for editing and tried to justify my edits. Also, blanking my talk page didn't mean that I never replied to any of the users. I only erased them because as you said It's my right, but only when I felt I can't contribute here, or when I felt the conversation was over. Also, I never removed my fellow co-editor Vestrian24bio's additions to the International Cricket page. I always only added my own stuff, which was removed. And I didn't try to revise anything that was removed by Vestrian24bio on that page. I feel that I have been blocked without doing anything wrong, I don't think if anywhere I was told that don't edit a single thing on this page, as if Vestrian24bio is God and can't make mistakes, and therefore I believed I have right to do what I think is right, without completely overseeing what he did. Because, if someone else believes that such information is not needed there, it doesn't mean that guy is always correct. I don't know how to say, but I was never wrong anytime. I wasn't even given a warning, so that I could even think of if I was doing something wrong. I don't know if you will unblock me or not. But I know that I didn't break my promise. I was blocked even when I was trying to do good. Even though I am sorry. Wi5hakeki (talk) 14:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am obliged to say a few things here,

I am no God; there's only one God.
You first added them here, which you had the right to do, but I disagreed with it and you should've reached out to the talk page instead of WP:BRD.
Then you re-added them for the second time, and another user (Drmies) reverted it and told you to Discuss on talk page.
You left me a message here; but you removed it here before I even got to see your message. If you had just left that message on, we could've discussed the matter right there.
Then you re-added for the third time, which is exactly what edit warring is.

Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 06:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wi5hakeki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't do anything but request to unblock me, but It's really frustrating for me. First of all, now I know that it's not a guarantee that what I think I am doing correct, is good in eyes of somebody else, I can get blocked even for doing genuine edits which are not baseless or fake. Yes, I didn't realise I did anything wrong, and I am sorry for it. If I can get unblocked in future, I won't even try to retry my challenged edit. Even if it is accurate in my eyes, cause it doesn't matter, does it?? I should be trying to seek talk page, this is my biggest mistake, I accept this, cause I should not expect the others to be understandable. I know I must have somewhere done any edits which involved modifying other's edit, but I did that never to defeat someone. It is simply what I thought is more precise, but then I wonder how would I ever be able to modify anything if someone else just doesn't think if I did something notable. But being blocked for edit-war is I don't realise is what I did so, I sincerely request the authorities to give me another chance, even though I know I promised it earlier as well, but still I would like to be better next time. I am sorry.

Decline reason:

A promise not to edit war isn't going to cut it when you were blocked for it before and made the same promise. I'm not convinced you even uderstand what edit warring is and why it is absolutely not tolerated here. You'll need to explain your understanding of this in your own words if you want to be unblocked. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 02:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why should we believe that you will now not edit war, when you said that before and broke that pledge? What will you do differently? Once trust is destroyed, it's very hard to get it back(see The Boy Who Cried Wolf). 331dot (talk) 10:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]