User talk:Whoppersnapper
|
AfD Nomination: Camp Kee Tov
[edit]I've nominated the article Camp Kee Tov for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Camp Kee Tov satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Kee Tov. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Camp Kee Tov during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. - CobaltBlueTony 13:38, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
List of $100 Million Contracts on AfD
[edit]Hi, I just wanted to let you know that an article you created is up for deletion. I happen to think it's a good article and deserves to stay. Here's the link to the discussion page. →Bobby← 19:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Jadrool
[edit]Jadrool has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this term might not be significant enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so. Remember, however, that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so articles about the meanings and usages of terms are not appropriate either.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Assaf Seewi for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assaf Seewi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.