User talk:Whittydw

Thanks for experimenting with the page Roy Heather on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. haz (user talk) 18:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed a tag on the article Jeff Rudom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. I did this because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Jeff Rudom is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Jeff Rudom. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not just remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrie

I reverted your edit back to what it was before (i.e. without the deaths and returning/upcoming characters). See List of characters from Coronation Street talk page and the discussion page for reasons why. Mark272 23:13, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrie Deaths

Regardless of anything, the deaths are at a new article, so don't put them back.

Celebrity Fit Club

I appreciate your hard work on this article, but please stop putting stuff back after it has been removed. The page had a cleanup tag on it for a reason. Ckessler 22:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whittydw, stop readding information that was removed during cleanup. You are welcome to edit, but this is the second time I've asked you to stop reverting. I will seek admin intervention if you continue. Ckessler 16:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The material you have repeatedly added to the Celebrity Fit Club, which you so proudly crow about on your user page, is taken verbatim from the ITV Celebrity Fit Club page. This makes your repeated editing against consensus not only obnoxious but a violation of one of the most fundamental rules of Wikipedia. See WP:CV. Please stop. · rodii · 17:44, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whittydw, stop readding information that was removed during cleanup. You are welcome to edit, but this is the second time I've asked you to stop reverting. I will seek admin intervention if you continue. Ckessler 16:47, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Whittydw here what are you gonna do about it mate im only trying to make it a good site. Itidyed the ste up making teams in the british and amerivan sections ive made countless edits go have a look what it was like before i first edited smart arse. Whittydw

Your "useful edits" were copyvio in addition to just being annoying. You have been warned on your talk page and on the article talk page. Knock it off. Ckessler 15:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not an admin, but Whittydw, you are on thin ice with the copyright violations. You cannot just copy text from some other site and use it here. · rodii · 02:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a Celebrity...

Please could you change the link on your user page to point to I'm a Celebrity... Get Me Out of Here! ? Many thanks. -TonyW (talk) 20:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Austin Healey, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. noq (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jim Branning, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kayau Voting IS evil 08:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]