Jump to content

User talk:White Main Deochellans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to editing Wikipedia. Firstly, note that a talk page is for discussion related to working on the encyclopaedia, not for posting articles promoting your views, so I am removing the previous content from this page. Secondly, there are various problems with your recent editing of Teochew people. The text you have psoted is not supported by any reliable sources, and looks as though it may be your own original ideas. Wikipedia accepts only material which is supported by reliable sources, and not original research. Repeatedly making similar edits to restore your own preferred version of an article without discussing the changes with other editors is known as edit-warring. and is considered unacceptable. in fact if it continues it can even lead to being blocked from editing. There are also problems with the content of your edits, some of them very minor, others more significant. To mention just one very simple example, in English the word that refers to transliterating a language into the Roman alphabet is "Romanise". The word "Latinise" is quite different in meaning, referring to recasting words into a form based on the Latin language. Perhaps you realise now why your edits have been reverted. Please do not restore them. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Taksin. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:20, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are all the Inogoloid (Ethnic Chinese) mandarin-dialect speakers and the common Ethnic European English-dialect speakers' writings fair and untainted by their Western Racism and unfettered Ethnic European views?

How do you account for the Ethnic African (Negoloid that's how the word of the Whites of non-Ethnic European stock for Ethnic African varieties) become Black people and not lowly Ethnic African Slaves?

The words are English, but the way you lined them up makes little sense to me. Could you try that again? What's your point? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How the family of Ethnic European English-dialects becomes the standard English-dialect for billions of the sub-family dialect and yet why and how the Ethnic European English-dialect of the Ethnic African varieties make perfect sense to them but not to you?

OK -- I read the "draft" of your little essay that was previously posted on this talkpage... I'm afraid we live on different planets and whatever is going in the Ethnic Werld you come from, inhabited by Inogloids and Norgoloids or whatnot, is of little concern to me. Just don't post any of that in stuff into any of the articles here, OK? If you do, I'd have to call Houston on my planet and say "we have a problem". Thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Ethnic groups in Africa, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Ethnic groups in Africa, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There have been numerous inaccuracies in your edits. For example, by no means all East African languages are semitic. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously believe that your version unbiased and without unfettered 'personal analyses' as you called it? If yes, you and your cohorts are seriously deluding yourselves now. In the future, you'll wake up to what is free and independent verifiable sources are without your ethnic Inogoloid and Negoloid clowns and your Ethnic European English-dialect speakers' iron-fist censorship!

Why are the Ethnic African varieties including Ethnic African Arabs not deserving or their real identities? and the Ethnic Inogoloid Hakka-dialect speakers in that matters as well?

I still only understand half of what you're saying, but on my planet, this sounds close to a personal attack. You're approaching "Houston (we have a problem)" Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to expound your own views, there are plenty of blog-hosting web sites out there, many of them free. So for no cost, you can pour out each and every thought that enters your head if you like, and anyone who cares can read about them. But Wikipedia does not host original ideas, and so you cannot publish your opinions or analysis here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is your socalled 'personal analysis'? Are your cohorts's views on a myriad of topics not just you and your clowns (from your 'Ethnic European Planet' or rather Ethnic European dominated planet?) views? Eg, the Teochew People and Language there are only your cohorts play on the ignorant Ethnic Inogoloid mandarin-dialect speakers. Your spins are full of whole and deceptions!

FYI chooyoo? you can sharpen my pencil with your mouth!

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. OK. We have a problem. I warned you nicely, but I don't think you can keep going like that Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look, the link I gave you is written in simple English and others have been explaining the problems in simple English. If you can't understand it, I'm afraid I can't really do anything more to help you. I can only advise you to try to listen to and understand what people are telling you, and stop making the kind of edits that have been earning you these warnings. And stop posting ethnic slurs, as that is also likely to get you blocked, as Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 has already warned you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's incredulous how you called one thing ethnocentric at the same as you accused other doing you flaggrantly do to the native people of Asia! Stop pretending you are any better than others! Your cleverness is astounding!

ANI

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:59, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Persistent WP:OR topped with personal attack. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]