Jump to content

User talk:Whinyharedy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Whinyharedy, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Dannyjade Read! Talk! 07:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
A plate of chocolate chip cookies.
Welcome!

Hello, Whinyharedy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Dannyjade Read! Talk! 07:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

[edit]

Hello, Whinyharedy,

You have been editing for one day and have 12 edits with this account. Unless you are a returning blocked editor, you do not have the editing experience or knowledge of Wikipedia policy to fully participate in a thoughtful way in AFD deletion discussions. Please learn how to edit over the next few weeks or months before you try to take on interpreting how notability policies should be applied to articles. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Margaret Brownson Obi for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margaret Brownson Obi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Brownson Obi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 16:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dusti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Draft:Felix Omobude—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dusti*Let's talk!* 14:44, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diocesan High School, Gombe moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Diocesan High School, Gombe. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 07:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:David Eribe per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/David Eribe. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 10:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]