User talk:Wheelock7002t

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Homerjay90 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

January 2010

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User talk:Ttonyb1, you will be blocked from editing. Please don't give false warnings Momo san ^Gespräch 16:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Homerjay90 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Years

Per consenses on Wikipedia_talk:YEARS#Is 2012 an "is", or a "will be"?, please do not change "was" to "is" for past years. 152.16.59.102 (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. Kuru (talk) 01:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]