User talk:Westin.payne

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EmeraldCityAir.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —rybec 04:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EmeraldCityAir concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EmeraldCityAir, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EmeraldCityAir

Hello Westin.payne. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "EmeraldCityAir".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/EmeraldCityAir}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to All Things Bright and Beautiful (album) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vanilla Twilight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambient. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Mac Miller, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Kristin Kontrol, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The 1975 ‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. clpo13_(talk) 22:40, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at xx (album) and Coexist (album). Dan56 (talk) 18:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Westin.payne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Sro23 (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Toiene0wwe90sd (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at I See You (The xx album), you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 01:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"We"

For your information, "we" are the ones who are constantly reverting you because you make poor arguments for your edits, and you constantly add them without sources, and rarely (but sometimes) include a summary with it. Nobody agrees with you. Stop warring over adding unsourced genres. This is why you were blocked a few weeks ago. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 18:19, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at I See You (The xx album). Dan56 (talk) 09:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for genre warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at I See You (The xx album) and Death of a Bachelor. This would be your third block in a month and would be a longer block than the previous one. Dan56 (talk) 06:20, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Westin.payne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It seems that I have been blocked for quite some time and I would like my account back to use at my university for a project. Thank you. Westin.payne (talk) 04:38, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's all well and good. Trouble is you have been blocked for making unsourced edits and genre warring. We need some indication that such disruption and any disruption I don't know about will not recur. Now as to the university project, there is no indication that I see that you are part of a class via Wikipedia:Education program. I strongly urge your instructor to coordinate any educational activities involving editing Wikipedia through them. Before you proceed further with that, you need to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students. Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.